Art forgeries and inherent value

British Journal of Aesthetics 27 (4):358-362 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjaesthetics/27.4.358

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Fakes and forgeries.Hunter Steele - 1977 - British Journal of Aesthetics 17 (3):254-258.
The aesthetic status of forgeries.Mark Sagoff - 1976 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 35 (2):169-180.
Versions and forgeries: A response to Kivy.Kirk Pillow - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2):177-179.
Forgeries and art evaluation: An argument for dualism in aesthetics.Tomas Kulka - 2005 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 39 (3):58-70.
Replicative forgery.John Zeimbekis - 2004 - Art and Cognition Workshops.
Artistic crimes.Denis Dutton - manuscript
Forgeries of Plautus.H. D. Jocelyn - 1981 - The Classical Review 31 (02):196-.
Scipionic Forgeries.Edwin W. Fay - 1920 - Classical Quarterly 14 (3-4):163-.
Inherent worth, respect, and rights.Louis G. Lombardi - 1983 - Environmental Ethics 5 (3):257-270.
Versions and "versions," forgeries and "forgeries": A response to Kirk pillow.Peter Kivy - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2):180-182.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
71 (#231,246)

6 months
1 (#1,472,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The empathy principle: Towards a model for the psychology of art.W. Ray Crozier & Paul Greenhalgh - 1992 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 22 (1):63–79.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references