David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical disagreement about justice ranges over at least two questions. The most immediate is a substantial question, concerning the conditions under which particular distributive arrangements can be said to be just or unjust. The second, deeper, question concerns the nature of justice itself. What is justice? Here we can distinguish three views. First, justice as mutual advantage sees justice as essentially a matter of the outcome of a bargain. There are times when two parties can both be better off by making some sort of agreement. Justice, on this view, concerns the distribution of the benefits and burdens of the agreement. Second, justice as reciprocity takes a different approach, looking not at bargaining but at the idea of a fair return or just price, attempting to capture the idea of justice as equal exchange. Finally justice as impartiality sees justice as ‘taking the other person’s point of view’ asking ‘how would you like it if it happened to you?’ Each model has significantly different consequences for the question of when issues of justice arise and how they should be settled. It is interesting to consider whether any of these models of justice could regulate behaviour between non-human animals
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska Carl (2011). Responsibility and Distributive Justice: An Introduction. In Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press
Michael Reber (2010). Distributive Justice and Free Market Economics: A Eudaimonistic Perspective. Libertarian Papers 2.
Wojciech Sadurski (1984). Social Justice and Legal Justice. Law and Philosophy 3 (3):329 - 354.
András Miklós (2011). The Basic Structure and the Principles of Justice. Utilitas 23 (2):161-182.
James P. Sterba (1988). How to Make People Just: A Practical Reconciliation of Alternative Conceptions of Justice. Rowman & Littlefield.
David Miller (2009). Justice and Boundaries. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (3):291-309.
Jonathan Wolff (2009). Rational, Fair, and Reasonable. Utilitas 8 (03):263-.
Chelsea Luthringer (2000). So What is Justice Anyway? Rosen Pub. Group.
Klaus R. Scherer (ed.) (1992). Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2010-07-26
Total downloads69 ( #32,576 of 1,699,801 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #105,649 of 1,699,801 )
How can I increase my downloads?