Philosophy of Neuroscience

《華文哲學百科》 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

神經科學哲學 (philosophy of neuroscience) 是科學哲學下的一個新興子領域，主要在探討神經科學研究活動中所牽涉的哲學問題。這裡指的研究活動包含設計實驗、使用特定研究技術、工具或方法、建構模型、推理模式、與科學說明等。本條目首先將簡述神經科學哲學興起的背景，而後詳述二十一世紀神經科學哲學的發展重點。

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement.Andrew Brook & Pete Mandik - 2007 - Analyse & Kritik 29 (1):3-23.
Neuroscience: More Than Just the Latest Paradigm.William Hirstein - 2014 - The Neuropsychotherapist 1:108-109.
Philosophical Implications of Affective Neuroscience.Stephen Asma, Jaak Panksepp, Rami Gabriel & Glennon Curran - 2012 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 19 (3-4):6-48.
Introduction — Mind, Cognition, and Neuroscience.Carolyn Dicey Jennings & Benjamin D. Young - 2021 - In Benjamin D. Young & Carolyn Dicey Jennings (eds.), Mind, Cognition, and Neuroscience: A Philosophical Introduction. Routledge.
Neural Mechanisms: New Challenges in the Philosophy of Neuroscience.Fabrizio Calzavarini & Marco Viola (eds.) - 2020 - Springer.
Dynamical Models and Explanation in Neuroscience.Lauren N. Ross - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (1):32-54.
Philosophy of Neuroscience.William Bechtel & Linus Ta-Lun Huang - 2022 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cognition and the Brain: The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement.Andrew Brook & Kathleen Akins (eds.) - 2005 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Promise of Neuroscience for Law: Hope or Hype?Stephen J. Morse - 2018 - In David Boonin, Katrina L. Sifferd, Tyler K. Fagan, Valerie Gray Hardcastle, Michael Huemer, Daniel Wodak, Derk Pereboom, Stephen J. Morse, Sarah Tyson, Mark Zelcer, Garrett VanPelt, Devin Casey, Philip E. Devine, David K. Chan, Maarten Boudry, Christopher Freiman, Hrishikesh Joshi, Shelley Wilcox, Jason Brennan, Eric Wiland, Ryan Muldoon, Mark Alfano, Philip Robichaud, Kevin Timpe, David Livingstone Smith, Francis J. Beckwith, Dan Hooley, Russell Blackford, John Corvino, Corey McCall, Dan Demetriou, Ajume Wingo, Michael Shermer, Ole Martin Moen, Aksel Braanen Sterri, Teresa Blankmeyer Burke, Jeppe von Platz, John Thrasher, Mary Hawkesworth, William MacAskill, Daniel Halliday, Janine O’Flynn, Yoaav Isaacs, Jason Iuliano, Claire Pickard, Arvin M. Gouw, Tina Rulli, Justin Caouette, Allen Habib, Brian D. Earp, Andrew Vierra, Subrena E. Smith, Danielle M. Wenner, Lisa Diependaele, Sigrid Sterckx, G. Owen Schaefer, Markus K. Labude, Harisan Unais Nasir, Udo Schuklenk, Benjamin Zolf & Woolwine (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophy and Public Policy. Springer Verlag. pp. 77-96.
El desafío antropológico de las neurociencias. Neurociencia, filosofía y teología.Juan José Sanguineti - 2015 - Rivista di Scienze dell'Educazione 53 (3):383-400.
Foraging for Coherence in Neuroscience: A Pragmatist Orientation.Jay Schulkin - 2016 - Contemporary Pragmatism 13 (1):1-28.
Moral Neuroscience and Moral Philosophy: Interactions for Ecological Validity.Koji Tachibana - 2009 - Kagaku Tetsugaku 42 (2):41-58.
How is Neuroscience Possible?Steven M. Duncan - manuscript
What Can Neuroscience Bring to Education?Michel Ferrari - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1):31-36.
Not Just Philosophy of Neuroscience but Philosophy and Neuroscience.Barry C. Smith - 2018 - The Philosophers' Magazine 83:94-101.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-04

Downloads
8 (#1,322,157)

6 months
6 (#529,161)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Karen Yan
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references