Divine Commands and the Social Nature of Obligation

Faith and Philosophy 4 (3):262-275 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Divine command metaethics is one of those theories according to which the nature of obligation is grounded in personal or social relationships. In this paper I first try to show how facts about human relationships can fill some of the role that facts of obligation aresupposed to play, specifically with regard to moral motivation and guilt. Then I note certain problems that arise for social theories of obligation, and argue that they can be dealt with more adequately by an expansion of our vision of the social dimension of ethics to include God as the most important participant in our system of personal relationships.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,549

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Divine Commands Are Unnecessary for Moral Obligation.Erik Wielenberg - 2022 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 21 (1).
An Adamsian Theory of Moral Obligations but without Divine Commands.Seyyed Abbas Kazemi Oskooei - 2023 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 25 (1):101-119.
A Theory of Moral Obligation.Christopher R. Dodsworth - 2008 - Dissertation, University of Michigan
Covenants and Commands.Toni Alimi - 2020 - Journal of Religious Ethics 48 (3):498-518.
Adams on the nature of obligation.Jeffrey Stout - 2009 - In Samuel Newlands & Larry M. Jorgensen (eds.), Metaphysics and the good: themes from the philosophy of Robert Merrihew Adams. New York: Oxford University Press.
God and Moral Obligation.C. Stephen Evans - 2013 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
227 (#93,169)

6 months
14 (#257,487)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Theological voluntarism.Mark Murphy - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2019.
Divine Command Theory without a Divine Commander.Robert Bass - 2023 - Journal of Value Inquiry 1:1-19.
Five problems for the moral consensus about sins.Mike Ashfield - 2021 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 90 (3):157-189.
The problem of arbitrary requirements: an Abrahamic perspective.Sara Aronowitz, Marilie Coetsee & Amir Saemi - 2020 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 89 (3):221-242.
3.17 John Locke on the Relationship between God and Morality.Peter P. Cvek - 2012 - Ultimate Reality and Meaning 35 (3-4):260-285.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Divine Command Metaethics Modified Again.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1979 - Journal of Religious Ethics 7 (1):66 - 79.
Divine Command Metaethics Modified Again.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1999 - In Eleonore Stump & Michael J. Murray (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: The Big Questions. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 412-416.

Add more references