Grounding procedural rights

Legal Theory (1):3-25 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contrary to the widely accepted consensus, Christopher Heath Wellman argues that there are no pre-institutional judicial procedural rights. Thus commonly affirmed rights like the right to a fair trial cannot be assumed in the literature on punishment and legal philosophy as they usually are. Wellman canvasses and rejects a variety of grounds proposed for such rights. I answer his skepticism by proposing two novel grounds for procedural rights. First, a general right against unreasonable risk of punishment grounds rights to an institutionalized system of punishment. Second, to complement and extend the first ground, I more controversially propose a right to provision of the robust good of security. People have a right to others' protecting for avoiding wrongfully harming them: when I take an action that is reasonably expected to threaten the protected interests of others, I must take appropriate care to avoid setting back those interests. Inflicting punishment on someone--intentionally harming them in response to a violation--is prima facie wrongful, so I can only count as taking appropriate care in punishing when I follow familiar procedures that reliably and redundantly test whether they are liable to such punishment, i.e. whether they have forfeited their right against punishment through a culpable act.

Similar books and articles

Rights Forfeiture and Punishment.Christopher Heath Wellman - 2016 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Procedural rights.Christopher Heath Wellman - 2014 - Legal Theory 20 (4):286-306.
Understanding Punishment as Annulment.Jami L. Anderson - 1998 - Social Philosophy Today 13:215-226.
The Theory of the Offender's Forfeited Right.Brian Rosebury - 2015 - Criminal Justice Ethics 34 (3):259-283.
Innocence Lost: A Problem for Punishment as Duty.Patrick Tomlin - 2017 - Law and Philosophy 36 (3):225-254.
Doing Without Desert.Victor Tadros - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (3):605-616.
Rights, explanation, and risks.David McCarthy - 1997 - Ethics 107 (2):205-225.
Habeas Corpus as Jus Cogens in International Law.Larry May - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):249-265.
Quinn on punishment and using persons as means.Michael Otsuka - 1996 - Law and Philosophy 15 (2):201 - 208.
Rights within the social contract : Rousseau on punishment.Corey Brettschneider - 2011 - In Austin Sarat, Lawrence Douglas & Martha Merrill Umphrey (eds.), Law as Punishment/Law as Regulation. Stanford Law Books.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-10

Downloads
614 (#29,036)

6 months
123 (#32,944)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

N. P. Adams
University of Virginia

Citations of this work

The Procedure of Morality.Ori Herstein & Ofer Malcai - 2024 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 27 (1).

Add more citations

References found in this work

Towards a right against risking.John Oberdiek - 2009 - Law and Philosophy 28 (4):367 - 392.
Risky Killing and the Ethics of War.Seth Lazar - 2015 - Ethics 126 (1):91-117.
Procedural rights.Christopher Heath Wellman - 2014 - Legal Theory 20 (4):286-306.

Add more references