Debate: Legal Probabilism—A Qualified Rejection: A Response to Hedden and Colyvan

Journal of Political Philosophy 28 (1):117-128 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Journal of Political Philosophy, EarlyView.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Legal Probabilism: A Qualified Defence.Brian Hedden & Mark Colyvan - 2019 - Journal of Political Philosophy 27 (4):448-468.
Debate: Legitimate injustice: A response to Wellman.Jonathan Quong - 2023 - Journal of Political Philosophy 31 (2):222-232.
Debate: Taking Offense.George Sher - 2020 - Journal of Political Philosophy 28 (3):332-342.
Debate: Taking Offense: A Reply.Jeremy Waldron - 2020 - Journal of Political Philosophy 28 (3):343-352.
Legal Transitions without Legitimate Expectations.Fergus Green - 2020 - Journal of Political Philosophy 28 (4):397-420.
Ronald Dworkin : life and works.Lokendra Malik - 2018 - In Salman Khurshid, Lokendra Malik & Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco (eds.), Dignity in the legal and political philosophy of Ronald Dworkin. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
Ronald Dworkin and free speech.James Allan - 2018 - In Salman Khurshid, Lokendra Malik & Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco (eds.), Dignity in the legal and political philosophy of Ronald Dworkin. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-03

Downloads
19 (#825,863)

6 months
5 (#710,311)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Grounding legal proof.Michael S. Pardo - 2021 - Philosophical Issues 31 (1):280-298.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references