Nursing Philosophy 14 (1):45-52 (2013)
AbstractVirtue ethics is often proposed as a third way in health‐care ethics, that while consequentialism and deontology focus on action guidelines, virtue focuses on character; all three aim to help agents discern morally right action although virtue seems to have least to contribute to political issues, such as austerity. I claim: This is a bad way to characterize virtue ethics. The 20th century renaissance of virtue ethics was first proposed as a response to the difficulty of making sense of ‘moral rightness’ outside a religious context. For Aristotle the right action is that which is practically best; that means best for the agent in order to live a flourishing life. There are no moral considerations besides this. Properly characterized, virtue ethics can contribute to discussion of austerity. A criticism of virtue ethics is that fixed characteristics seem a bad idea in ever‐changing environments; perhaps we should be generous in prosperity, selfish in austerity. Furthermore, empirical evidence suggests that people indeed do change with their environment. However, I argue that virtues concern fixed values not fixed behaviour; the values underlying virtue allow for different behaviour in different circumstances: in austerity, virtues still give the agent the best chance of flourishing. Two questions arise. In austere environments might not injustice help an individual flourish by, say, obtaining material goods? No, because unjust acts undermine the type of society the agent needs for flourishing. What good is virtue to those lacking the other means to flourish? The notion of degrees of flourishing shows that most people would benefit somewhat from virtue. However, in extreme circumstances virtue might harm rather than benefit the agent: such circumstances are to be avoided; virtue ethics thus has a political agenda to enable flourishing. This requires justice, a fortiori when in austerity
Similar books and articles
Metaphysical austerity and the problems of temporal and modal anaphora.Peter Ludlow - 2001 - In James Tomberlin (ed.), Metaphysics. Blackwell. pp. 211--28.
Austerity and Openness.R. M. Sainsbury - 2006 - In Cynthia Macdonald & Graham Macdonald (eds.), McDowell and his critics. Blackwell. pp. 6--1.
Law, morality, and virtue.Peter Koller - 2007 - In Rebecca L. Walker & Philip J. Ivanhoe (eds.), Working Virtue: Virtue Ethics and Contemporary Moral Problems. Oxford University Press.
Dispositionalism, ostension, and austerity.Michael Watkins - 1994 - Philosophical Studies 73 (1):55 - 86.
Examining Loyalty: The Folk & The Philosopher.John D. Baldari - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Nevada, Reno
The unfounded austerity: Upanisadic monachism.Ian Watson - 1971 - Philosophy East and West 21 (3):325-329.
Capitalism, the state and health care in the age of austerity: a Marxist analysis.Sam Porter - 2013 - Nursing Philosophy 14 (1):5-16.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The need for empathetic healthcare systems.Angeliki Kerasidou, Kristine Bærøe, Zackary Berger & Amy E. Caruso Brown - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (12):e27-e27.
Empathy and Efficiency in Healthcare at Times of Austerity.Angeliki Kerasidou - 2019 - Health Care Analysis 27 (3):171-184.
Dignity and the capabilities approach in long-term care for older people.Jari Pirhonen - 2015 - Nursing Philosophy 16 (1):29-39.
The impact of economic recession on health-care and the contribution by nurses to promote individuals' dignity.Sofia Nunes, Guilhermina Rego & Rui Nunes - 2015 - Nursing Inquiry 22 (4):285-295.
References found in this work
After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory.Alasdair C. MacIntyre - 1983 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Frontiers of justice: disability, nationality, species membership.Martha C. Nussbaum (ed.) - 2006 - Belknap Press.
Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior.John M. Doris - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.