Utilitas 9 (2):167-181 (1997)

Authors
Abstract
Many forms of virtue ethics, like certain forms of utilitarianism, suffer from the problem of indirection. In those forms, the criterion for status of a trait as a virtue is not the same as the criterion for the status of an act as right. Furthermore, if the virtues for example are meant to promote the nourishing of the agent, the virtuous agent is not standardly supposed to be motivated by concern for her own flourishing in her activity. In this paper, I propose a virtue ethics which does not suffer from the problem. Traits are not virtues because their cultivation and manifestation promote a value such as agent flourishing. They are virtues in so far as they are habits of appropriate response to various relevant values. This means that there is a direct connection between the rationale of a virtue and what makes an action virtuous or right.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0953820800005264
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,497
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Restrictive Consequentialism.Philip Pettit & Geoffrey Brennan - 1986 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64 (4):438 – 455.
What Is Virtue Ethics All About?Gregory Trianosky - 1990 - American Philosophical Quarterly 27 (4):335 - 344.
The Varieties of Goodness.Philippa Foot - 1963 - Philosophical Review 74 (2):240-244.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Virtue Ethics is Self-Effacing.Simon Keller - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2):221 – 231.
Is Virtue Ethics Self-Effacing?Glen Pettigrove - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (3):191-207.
The Value of the Virtues.Michael Sean Brady - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 125 (1):85-113.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Right Action and the Targets of Virtue.Liezl van Zyl - 2014 - In S. van Hooft, N. Athanassoulis, J. Kawall, L. van Zyl & J. Oakley (eds.), The Handbook of Virtue Ethics. Acumen Publishing.
Four Solutions to the Alleged Incompleteness of Virtue Ethics.Dean McAleer - 2010 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 4 (3):1-20.
Right-Makers and the Targets of Virtue.Nicholas Smith - 2017 - Journal of Value Inquiry 51 (2):311-326.
Virtue Ethics and the Problem of Moral Disagreement.Christine Swanton - 2010 - Philosophical Topics 38 (2):157-180.
Virtue Ethics and the Charge of Egoism.Julia Annas - 2007 - In Paul Bloomfield (ed.), Morality and Self-Interest. Oxford University Press.
A Theory of Environmental Virtue.Ronald Sandler - 2006 - Environmental Ethics 28 (3):247-264.
Agent-Based Virtue Ethics and the Problem of Action Guidance.Liezl van Zyl - 2009 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (1):50-69.
A Theory of Environmental Virtue.Ronald Sandler - 2006 - Environmental Ethics 28 (3):247-264.
How to Think About Virtue and Right.Valerie Tiberius - 2006 - Philosophical Papers 35 (2):247-265.
Virtue Ethics: A Pluralistic View.S. M. Gardiner - 2005 - Mind 114 (453):207-212.
Virtue Ethics: A Pluralistic View.L. Tessman - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (3):414-416.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-30

Total views
176 ( #50,788 of 2,348,160 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #99,222 of 2,348,160 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes