On natural selection and Hume's second problem

Evolution and Cognition 4 (2):156-172 (1998)

Authors
Armando Aranda-Anzaldo
Universidad Autónoma Del Estado De México
Abstract
David Hume's famous riddle of induction implies a second problem related to the question of whether the laws and principles of nature might change in the course of time. Claims have been made that modern developments in physics and astrophysics corroborate the translational invariance of the laws of physics in time. However, the appearance of a new general principle of nature, which might not be derivable from the known laws of physics, or that might actually be a non-physical one (this means completely independent of physical science) supports the notion that the course of nature can change in time. Here it is argued that natural selection satisfies the criteria that identify a general principle of nature which so far, appears to be non-derivable from the known laws of physics and therefore, it is likely that it arose in the course of time, thus leaving open again the quest for a true solution to Hume's second problem.
Keywords Biogenesis  Darwin  Evolution  Natural law  Origin of life
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life.Daniel C. Dennett & Jon Hodge - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):435-438.

View all 59 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Darwin's Evolutionary Philosophy: The Laws of Change.Edward S. Reed - 1978 - Acta Biotheoretica 27 (3-4):201-235.
Darwin's Analogy Between Artificial and Natural Selection: How Does It Go?Susan G. Sterrett - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 33 (1):151-168.
Coadaptation and the Inadequacy of Natural Selection.Mark Ridley - 1982 - British Journal for the History of Science 15 (1):45-68.
Invarianzgesetze Und Zeitmetrik.Andreas Kamlah - 1973 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 4 (2):224-260.
What Darwin Got Wrong.Jerry A. Fodor - 2010 - Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Against Darwinism.Jerry Fodor - 2008 - Mind and Language 23 (1):1–24.
On the Emergence of Living Systems.Bruce H. Weber - 2009 - Biosemiotics 2 (3):343-359.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-03

Total views
479 ( #8,764 of 2,253,874 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
126 ( #3,600 of 2,253,874 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature