Hossein Atrak
University of Zanjan
Abstract This article delves into the study of the term «tark-i awlà» (abandoning performance of that which is better and doing that which is less than better) as an approach for defending the infallibility of the prophets when confronting verses from the Holy Qur‘ān that apparently prove the prophets committed sins; and after going into the semantics of «tark-i awlà», the following question has been made the focus of discussion and study: are the intellectual arguments proving the infalliblity of the Prophets in agreement with the fact that the prophets committed tark-i awlà? According to the author, considering that tark-i awlà is a type of error and lapse and because the intellectual arguments for infallibility (like the trust and certitude of the people, the guiding purpose of prophet hood, the necessity of following the prophets, the principle of luṭf (grace) and absence of disinclination in the hearts of the people towards the prophets) necessitate the negation of all types of errors and lapses from the prophets, the prophets must be infallible from tark-i awlà too and this approach by Islamic theologians in justifying the verses that indicate the committing of sins by the prophets is not successful. Accepting the committing of tark-i awlà by the prophets is to accept that they committed errors and is against the belief of the Shi‘a regarding the infallibility of the prophets. As a result, Shi‘a theology will face a great challenge in justifying the verses that indicate the committing of errors and lapses by the Prophets which, according to the author, necessitates a revision of the Shi‘a theological belief in regards to the absolute infallibility of the prophets.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Fakhr Al-Din Al-Razi on the Extent of Prophets’ Innocence.Alireza Parsa & Ali Parimi - 2016 - پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین 13 (2):27-52.
The Prophets in Recent Study: 1967–197.James Limburg - 1978 - Interpretation 32 (1):56-68.
Prophethood and the Some Objections of Disbelievers.Abdullah Namlı - 2018 - Tasavvur - Tekirdag Theology Journal 4 (2):470 - 504.
The Prophets’ Knowledge and Certainty Regarding the Authenticity of Revelation.Yadullah Dadjoo - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 19 (74):109-207.
Book Review: He Gave Some Prophets. The Old Testament Prophets and Their Message. [REVIEW]E. Leslie Carlson - 1965 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 19 (3):376-377.
Coleridge and Emerson: Prophets of Silence, Prophets of Language.Frank Lentricchia - 1973 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 32 (1):37-46.
Nahum—Habakkuk—Zephaniah: Reading the “Former Prophets” in the Persian Period.Julia M. O'Brien - 2007 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 61 (2):168-183.


Added to PP index

Total views
66 ( #163,928 of 2,455,405 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #54,381 of 2,455,405 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes