Synthese 194 (9):3393-3419 (2017)

Authors
Jean Baccelli
Oxford University
Abstract
This paper examines the preference-based approach to the identification of beliefs. It focuses on the main problem to which this approach is exposed, namely that of state-dependent utility. First, the problem is illustrated in full detail. Four types of state-dependent utility issues are distinguished. Second, a comprehensive strategy for identifying beliefs under state-dependent utility is presented and discussed. For the problem to be solved following this strategy, however, preferences need to extend beyond choices. We claim that this a necessary feature of any complete solution to the problem of state-dependent utility. We also argue that this is the main conceptual lesson to draw from it. We show that this lesson is of interest to both economists and philosophers
Keywords Beliefs  Subjective probability  State-dependent utility  Hypothetical preferences  Revealed preference  decision theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-015-0939-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Foundations of Statistics.Leonard J. Savage - 1954 - Wiley Publications in Statistics.
Truth and Probability.Frank Ramsey - 1926 - In Antony Eagle (ed.), Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings. Routledge. pp. 52-94.
The Foundations of Statistics.Leonard J. Savage - 1956 - Philosophy of Science 23 (2):166-166.
A Nonpragmatic Vindication of Probabilism.James M. Joyce - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (4):575-603.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Problem of State-Dependent Utility: A Reappraisal.Jean Baccelli - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (2):617-634.
Expected Utility in 3D.Jean Baccelli - forthcoming - In Reflections on the Foundations of Statistics: Essays in Honor of Teddy Seidenfeld.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Eliciting Beliefs.Robert Chambers & Tigran Melkonyan - 2008 - Theory and Decision 65 (4):271-284.
De Finetti Was Right: Probability Does Not Exist.Robert F. Nau - 2001 - Theory and Decision 51 (2/4):89-124.
Living Without State-Independence of Utilities.Brian Hill - 2009 - Theory and Decision 67 (4):405-432.
Lottery Dependent Utility: A Reexamination.Ulrich Schmidt - 2001 - Theory and Decision 50 (1):35-58.
The Moral Belief Problem.Neil Sinclair - 2006 - Ratio 19 (2):249–260.
Interval Scalability of Rank-Dependent Utility.Mikhail V. Sokolov - 2011 - Theory and Decision 70 (3):255-282.
Risk and Risk Aversion for State-Dependent Utility.David Kelsey - 1992 - Theory and Decision 33 (1):71-82.
Newcomb's Problem.Jackie Ray Caughran - 1980 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Bases for Preferences Among Three-Outcome Bets.Sarah Lichtenstein - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (2):162.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-10-10

Total views
121 ( #96,719 of 2,507,664 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #59,821 of 2,507,664 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes