On the evolution of natural laws

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (3):343-370 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

's argumentation in favour of essential invariability of the fundamental laws of nature is critically examined. It is contended that within the realist framework Poincareé's arguments lose their apodictical force. In this sense the assumption of inconstancy of even the fundamental laws of nature is methodologically legitimate.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Explaining the modal force of natural laws.Andreas Bartels - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9 (1):6.
Can the fundamental laws of nature be the results of evolution?Abner Shimony - 1999 - In Jeremy Butterfield & Constantine Pagonis (eds.), From Physics to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 208--223.
On Wheeler's notion of “law without law” in physics.David Deutsch - 1986 - Foundations of Physics 16 (6):565-572.
The world as one of a kind: Natural necessity and laws of nature.John Bigelow, Brian Ellis & Caroline Lierse - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (3):371-388.
Laws and meta-laws of nature: Conservation laws and symmetries.Marc Lange - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (3):457-481.
Lange and laws, kinds, and counterfactuals.Alexander Bird - 2011 - In Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & Matthew H. Slater (eds.), Carving nature at its joints: natural kinds in metaphysics and science. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
The fundamental laws of physics can tell the truth.Renat Nugayev - 1991 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (1):79 – 87.
Natural Law in American Revolutionary Thought.Andrew J. Reck - 1977 - Review of Metaphysics 30 (4):686 - 714.
Unexpected a posteriori necessary laws of nature.Alexander Bird - 2005 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (4):533 – 548.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
7 (#1,413,139)

6 months
192 (#16,166)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What Price Changing Laws of Nature?Olivier Sartenaer, Alexandre Guay & Paul Humphreys - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (1):1-19.
Althusser's Late Thinking About Materialism.Wal Suchting - 2004 - Historical Materialism 12 (1):3-70.
Bibliography on philosophy of chemistry.E. R. Scerri - 1997 - Synthese 111 (3):305-324.
Cosmologies with varying speed of light: A historical perspective.Helge S. Kragh - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (4):726-737.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references