Authors
Ariane Bazan
Université Libre de Bruxelles
Abstract
As Ebbinghaus (1908) tells us in the opening words of his popular textbook of psychology, “psychology has a long past but only a short history.” In my opinion, there are three foundational moments in the history of psychology and, paradoxically, all three are moments of great advancement in biology. First, in the long past of psychology, psychology did not exist as such but was part of philosophy. It is extremely interesting to understand why it has been necessary, at one point of time in the sixteenth century, to invent this field and to create a signifier – namely “psychology” – separate from philosophy, which enabled the field to distinguish itself from philosophy (Mengal, 2000/2001). In this century of religious violence, bare corpses lay everywhere and progresses in anatomy are major. In 1540, the German religious reformer Philippe Melanchthon publishes a book which comments the De anima of Aristotle and he completes the Aristotelian text with a long treaty of anatomy (Mengal, 2000/2001). On the basis of this new knowledge, Melanchthon attributes functions to the body which were previously reserved for the soul. The brain becomes the principal organ of sensory functions and displaces the heart as the seat of emotional life and of thought. To the Aristotelian position that all living beings, whether plant, animal, or human, to varying degrees possess a soul which organizes the body, Melanchthon opposes a dualistic anthropology which divides the human in body and soul. The two-dimensional “anthropologia” is articulated in “anatomia,” science of body, and “psychologia,” science of the soul. It is this new anthropology that is diffused into the world of the Reformation (Mengal, 2000/2001). The Dutch reformer Snellius (1594), for example, defines the body and the soul by their respective essential property: “The rational soul of man is the thought that, coupled with the body, completes man. (…) The physical things closer to natural bodies that move naturally, have an extension and for that reason occupy a space. (…) The faculty of the rational soul is the mind or will. Thought is the faculty of the soul to discourse and think about things which are and which are not.”1 (Snellius, 1594, pp. 26–27). It is as a philosopher that René Descartes proposes his dualist vision much in line with the reformist opinions. Descartes dissects animals and human cadavers and is familiar with the research on the flow of blood (Fuchs, 2001). He comes to the conclusion that the body is a complex device that is capable of moving without the soul, thus contradicting the Aristotelian doctrine of the soul. The metaphysical order, which states that the body exists by the soul, is broken.
Keywords epistemology  history of science  psychoanalysis  neuropsychoanalysis  psychology  dualism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Grundzuge der Physiologischen Psychologie.W. Wundt - 1893 - Philosophical Review 2:637.
Event-Related Markers of Unconscious Processes.Howard Shevrin - 2001 - International Journal of Psychophysiology. Special Issue 42 (2):209-218.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Cartesian Scientia and the Human Soul.Lilli Alanen - 2008 - Vivarium 46 (3):418-442.
Stages of Soul as Viewed by Ibn Arabi.S. Vaezi - unknown - Kheradnameh Sadra Quarterly 11.
The Passions of the Soul and Descartes’s Machine Psychology.Gary Hatfield - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (1):1-35.
Soul and Body.John Sutton - 2013 - In Peter Anstey (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century. Oxford University Press. pp. 285-307.
Aquinas and Siger in the Thirteenth Century-Monopsychism Controversy.Jaekyung Lee - 2000 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
The Logos of the Soul.Evangelos Christou - 1963 - Spring Publications.
Explorations of Plotinus' Philosophical Psychology.Kelly Dean Jolley - 1994 - Dissertation, The University of Rochester

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-09-17

Total views
735 ( #10,337 of 2,519,571 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
168 ( #3,350 of 2,519,571 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes