Deciding the demos: three conceptions of democratic legitimacy

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 22 (4):412-431 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The prevailing view is that democratic procedures are unable to confer democratic legitimacy to decisions about democratic procedures. This paper examines this claim in detail and uses referendums on the inclusion of previously disenfranchised groups in the demos as a running example. The paper distinguishes between pure, imperfect and quasi-pure models of procedural democratic legitimacy and sub-versions of them. To various extents, each model does have the capacity to confer legitimacy to demos decisions under well-defined circumstances. The paper argues that quasi-pure procedural legitimacy represents the most promising account of democratic legitimacy in cases where democratic procedures are the subject of collective decision-making. According to this model, the decision to revise the rules for membership in the demos is permissible by democratic standards if and only if the revision is not forbidden by democratic principles for inclusion. The point is that the range of alternatives that are not forbidden by democratic principles of inclusion are likely to be considerable due to vagueness of the principles themselves and/or them being subject to reasonable disagreement. The paper concludes with a discussion about the possibility of democratic legitimacy for democratic institutions not introduced as a result of democratic decision-making.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deciding the demos: three conceptions of democratic legitimacy.Ludvig Beckman - 2019 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 22 (4):412-431.
The European Public(s) and its Problems.Axel Mueller - 2015 - In Hauke Brunkhorst, Charlotte Gaitanides & Gerhard Grözinger (eds.), Europe at a Crossroad. From Currency Union to Political and Economic Governance? Baden-Baden, Germany: pp. 19-59.
On the Demos and its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem.Arash Abizadeh - 2012 - American Political Science Review 106 (4):867-882.
Democratic inclusion, law, and causes.Ludvig Beckman - 2008 - Ratio Juris 21 (3):348-364.
Democratic legitimacy and proceduralist social epistemology.Fabienne Peter - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):329-353.
Democracy and legitimacy in plurinational societies.Genevieve Nootens - 2009 - Contemporary Political Theory 8 (3):276-294.
Sharing democracy.Michaele L. Ferguson - 2012 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-04-04

Downloads
28 (#487,591)

6 months
2 (#658,848)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ludvig Beckman
Stockholm University

Citations of this work

Democracy, respect for judgement and disagreement on democratic inclusion.Jonas Hultin Rosenberg - 2023 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 26 (4):506-527.

Add more citations