- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The problem of ascribing legal responsibility in the case of robotics
AI and Society 31 (4):473-481 (2016)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Killers, fridges, and slaves: a legal journey in robotics. [REVIEW]Ugo Pagallo - 2011 - AI and Society 26 (4):347-354.
Air Canada’s chatbot illustrates persistent agency and responsibility gap problems for AI.Joshua L. M. Brand - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-3.
Vicarious liability: a solution to a problem of AI responsibility?Matteo Pascucci & Daniela Glavaničová - 2022 - Ethics and Information Technology 24 (3):1-11.
HARMONIZING LAW AND INNOVATIONS IN NANOMEDICINE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) AND BIOMEDICAL ROBOTICS: A CENTRAL ASIAN PERSPECTIVE.Ammar Younas & Tegizbekova Zhyldyz Chynarbekovna - manuscript
Responsibility of AI Systems.Mehdi Dastani & Vahid Yazdanpanah - 2023 - AI and Society 38 (2):843-852.
Ethical regulations on robotics in Europe.Michael Nagenborg, Rafael Capurro, Jutta Weber & Christoph Pingel - 2008 - AI and Society 22 (3):349-366.
Corporate responsibility for the termination of digital friends.Nick Munn & Dan Weijers - 2023 - AI and Society 38 (4):1501-1502.
Social Robots with AI: Prospects, Risks, and Responsible Methods.Johanna Seibt, Peter Fazekas & Oliver Santiago Quick (eds.) - 2025 - Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Guest Editorial: Tech and the transformation of legal imagination.Leila Brännström, Gregor Noll, Amin Parsa & Markus Gunneflo - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-4.
Rethinking the I-You relation through dialogical philosophy in the Ethics of AI and robotics.Kathleen Richardson - 2019 - AI and Society 34 (1):1-2.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-02-04
Downloads
154 (#153,677)
6 months
13 (#221,719)
2016-02-04
Downloads
154 (#153,677)
6 months
13 (#221,719)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Mind the gaps: Assuring the safety of autonomous systems from an engineering, ethical, and legal perspective.Simon Burton, Ibrahim Habli, Tom Lawton, John McDermid, Phillip Morgan & Zoe Porter - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence 279 (C):103201.
Robots responding to care needs? A multitasking care robot pursued for 25 years, available products offer simple entertainment and instrumental assistance.Lina Van Aerschot & Jaana Parviainen - 2020 - Ethics and Information Technology 22 (3):247-256.
Legal framework for small autonomous agricultural robots.Subhajit Basu, Adekemi Omotubora, Matt Beeson & Charles Fox - 2020 - AI and Society 35 (1):113-134.
Robot use self-efficacy in healthcare work : development and validation of a new measure.Tuuli Turja, Teemu Rantanen & Atte Oksanen - 2019 - AI and Society 34 (1):137-143.
References found in this work
Technology as a Subject for Ethics.Hans Jonas - 1982 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 49.
Czym jest to, co zwiemy ucieleśnieniem?Tom Ziemke - 2015 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 6 (2-3):161-174.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-6fxz5 uwo