Hobbes against hate speech

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 32 (2):247-264 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article argues that Thomas Hobbes' analysis of insult or ‘contumely’ prefigures recent developments in moral and political philosophy in striking ways. Specifically, Hobbes's concerns about the dignitary harms in hate speech went well beyond ‘fighting words’ to the essential role played by expressions of hatred and contempt in making and unmaking social hierarchies. Hobbes’s sensitivity to contumely’s subtle power to constitute social in/equalities recalls recent work in feminist and critical race theory. Yet his expansive solutions – both negative and positive, legal and ethical – also shed light on the difficulties faced by aspirationally egalitarian societies in their efforts to eradicate contempt today.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is hate speech? Part 1: The Myth of Hate.Alexander Brown - 2017 - Law and Philosophy 36 (4):419-468.
What is Hate Speech? Part 2: Family Resemblances.Alexander Brown - 2017 - Law and Philosophy 36 (5):561-613.
Hobbes and the Politics of Translation.Alicia Steinmetz - 2021 - Political Theory 49 (1):83-108.
What Is the Harm of Hate Speech?Eric Barendt - 2019 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (3):539-553.
Recent Trends in German Hobbes Scholarship.Dirk Brantl - 2019 - Hobbes Studies 32 (1):92-115.
Dignity, Harm, and Hate Speech.Robert Mark Simpson - 2013 - Law and Philosophy 32 (6):701-728.
The Obsession of Thomas Hobbes: The English Civil War in Hobbes' Political Philosophy.Jules Steinberg - 1988 - Peter Lang Gmbh, Internationaler Verlag Der Wissenschaften.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-02-04

Downloads
29 (#546,512)

6 months
15 (#163,420)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations