Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 2 (1):109-119 (2008)

Authors
Jeffrey Bell
Southeastern Louisiana University
Abstract
For those familiar with the work of Deleuze, and Deleuze and Guattari, it might at first seem unwise to pursue a Deleuze and Guattarian philosophy of history. After all, is it not Deleuze who, in an interview with Antonio Negri, argues that ‘What history grasps in an event is the way it’s actualized in particular circumstances; the event's becoming is beyond the scope of history'? (Deleuze 1995: 170). And more damningly, Deleuze adds, ‘History isn’t experimental, it's just the set of more or less negative preconditions that make it possible to experiment with something beyond history' (Deleuze 1995: 170). History, in short, is a starting point for experimental work, but it is precisely history ‘that one leaves behind in order to “become,” that is, to create something new’ (1995: 171). Similarly in A Thousand Plateaus, Deleuze and Guattari argue that ‘History is made by those who oppose history (not by those who insert themselves into it, or even reshape it)’ (Deleuze and Guattari 1987: 295). In the very first line of his book, Lampert recognizes the possible conclusion these citations might lead one to, namely, ‘Deleuze and Guattari’s philosophy of becoming seems at times opposed to the very idea of historical succession' (1); and yet, as Lampert adeptly demonstrates, it would be a mistake to conclude that opposing history to ‘create something new’, ‘something beyond history’, necessarily entails being hostile to history, to the ‘idea of historical succession’, and thus to a philosophy of history.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3366/e1750224108000196
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,676
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Differential Point of View of the Infinitesimal Calculus in Spinoza, Leibniz and Deleuze.Simon Duffy - 2006 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 37 (3):286-307.
Gilles Deleuze and the History of Philosophy.John Sellars - 2007 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (3):551-560.
Nomadography.Robert T. Tally Jr - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 5 (11):15-24.
Deleuze, Marx and the Politicisation of Philosophy.Simon Choat - 2009 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 3 (Suppl):8-27.
McDeleuze: What's More Rhizomal Than the Big Mac?Kane X. Faucher - 2010 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 4 (1):42-59.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-07-11

Total views
46 ( #213,028 of 2,386,667 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #552,015 of 2,386,667 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes