Analysis

In The act itself. New York: Oxford University Press (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book employs philosophical analysis in an endeavour to grasp more firmly some concepts used in moral theory. Analysis is defended here against attackers, especially Rorty. Moral non‐realism is presented as an underlying assumption of the book, and related to the desire for consistency and generality in moral theory. Hare's notion of two levels of morality is defended.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gibbard's expressivism: An interdisciplinary critical analysis.Christine Clavien - 2009 - Philosophical Psychology 22 (4):465 – 485.
Conceptual Analysis in Metaethics.N. G. Laskowski & Stephen Finlay - 2017 - In Tristram Colin McPherson & David Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. New York: Routledge. pp. 536-551.
Connective conceptual analysis and psychology.Konrad Banicki - 2012 - Theory and Psychology 22 (3):310-323.
The fictionalist analysis of some moral concepts.Jay Newman - 1981 - Metaphilosophy 12 (1):47–56.
Moral Judgment Making: A Philosophical Analysis.Robert Paul Craig - 1987 - Dissertation, Loyola University of Chicago
Entrapment: An ethical analysis.B. Stitt & Gene James - 1985 - In Frederick A. Elliston & Michael Feldberg (eds.), Moral issues in police work. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Allanheld. pp. 129--147.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references