At first glance twentieth-century philosophy of science seems virtually to ignore chemistry. However this paper argues that a focus on chemistry helped shape the French philosophical reflections about the aims and foundations of scientific methods. Despite patent philosophical disagreements between Duhem, Meyerson, Metzger and Bachelard it is possible to identify the continuity of a tradition that is rooted in their common interest for chemistry. Two distinctive features of the French tradition originated in the attention to what was going on in chemistry.French philosophers of science, in stark contrast with analytic philosophers, considered history of science as the necessary basis for understanding how the human intellect or the scientific spirit tries to grasp the world. This constant reference to historical data was prompted by a fierce controversy about the chemical revolution, which brought the issue of the nature of scientific changes centre stage.A second striking—albeit largely unnoticed—feature of the French tradition is that matter theories are a favourite subject with which to characterize the ways of science. Duhem, Meyerson, Metzger and Bachelard developed most of their views about the methods and aims of science through a discussion of matter theories. Just as the concern with history was prompted by a controversy between chemists, the focus on matter was triggered by a scientific controversy about atomism in the late nineteenth-century.Keywords: France; Epistemology; Chemistry; Revolution; Atomism; Realism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.08.001
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,437
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Bachelard and the Problem of Epistemological Analysis.Stephen W. Gaukroger - 1976 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 7 (3):189.
Hélène Metzger: The History of Science Between the Study of Mentalities and Total History.Cristina Chimisso - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):203-241.
Duhem and Continuity in the History of Science.Roger Ariew & Peter Barker - 1992 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 46 (182):323-343.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Identity Versus Determinism: Émile Meyerson׳s Neo-Kantian Interpretation of the Quantum Theory.M. Anthony Mills - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 47:33-49.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Philosophy of Chemistry or Philosophy with Chemistry.Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent - 2014 - Hyle: International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 20 (1):59-76.
Gaston Bachelard and the Topicality of Historical Epistemology.Т.Д Соколова - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 48 (2):209-219.
What Did “Theory” Mean to Nineteenth-Century Chemists?Alan Rocke - 2013 - Foundations of Chemistry 15 (2):145-156.
The Emergence of the Philosophy of Chemistry.Lee McIntyre - 1999 - Foundations of Chemistry 1 (1):57-63.
On the Neglect of the Philosophy of Chemistry.J. van Brakel - 1999 - Foundations of Chemistry 1 (2):111-174.
Magic, Science and Masculinity: Marketing Toy Chemistry Sets.Salim Al-Gailani - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (4):372-381.


Added to PP index

Total views
42 ( #243,804 of 2,420,991 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #543,757 of 2,420,991 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes