On the Force-Feeding of Prisoners on Hunger Strike

HEC Forum:1-20 (forthcoming)
Abstract
Roughly 80,000 U.S. prisoners are held in solitary confinement at any given time. A significant body of research shows that solitary confinement has severe, long-term effects, and the United Nations has condemned the practice of solitary confinement as torture. For years, prisoners have been organizing hunger strikes in order to protest solitary confinement. But such action is not without consequences, and some inmates have suffered serious injury or death. The question I raise in this paper is whether we ought to force-feed hunger striking prisoners when serious harm is imminent. Both the World Medical Association and the American Medical Association have denounced the practice of force-feeding prisoners on hunger strike, and yet, the practice is common. Such prevalence is likely a result of the tension between the person-as-patient and person-as-prisoner and cannot easily be resolved. Instead, we must take seriously the complaint that solitary confinement is inhumane and avoid placing health professionals in the position where they must choose to force-feed the prisoner against his will or not. I argue that a conventional bioethics debate centering on polarizing principles of prisoner autonomy and a duty-to-protect the prisoner from harm is an inadequate framework for this complex issue. Instead, we must examine the prisoner’s intent and his right to freedom of speech. I argue that when the prisoner’s intent is to raise awareness and communicate with others, his hunger strike is a form of speech. Protest-as-speech is constitutionally protected—even for prisoners—and remains a minimum ethical obligation for society to uphold.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10730-018-9365-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,905
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Human Dignity, Humiliation, and Torture.David Luban - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (3):pp. 211-230.
Ethics by Committee: The Moral Authority of Consensus.Jonathan D. Moreno - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (4):411-432.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Role of Doctors in Hunger Strikes.Yechiel Michael Barilan - 2017 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 27 (3):341-369.
Prisoners’ Competence to Die: Hunger Strike and Cognitive Competence.Zohar Lederman - 2018 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 39 (4):321-334.
The Prisoner's Dilemma and the Prisoners of the Prisoner's Dilemma. Gilbert - 1996 - Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (2):165-178.
Organ Donation by Capital Prisoners in China: Reflections in Confucian Ethics.M. Wang & X. Wang - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):197-212.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-10-04

Total downloads
2 ( #948,989 of 2,293,828 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #253,244 of 2,293,828 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature