Philosophia 47 (4):1053-1068 (2019)

Daniele Bertini
University Of Rome 2, Tor Vergata
Victoria S. Harrison’s theory of internal pluralism approaches religious beliefs in terms of conceptual schemes. To her, this approach has the advantage of preserving core pluralist intuitions without being challenged by the usual difficulties. My claim is that this is not the case. After providing a succinct presentation of internal pluralism, I show that the critique of traditional pluralist views such as Hick’s may also be addressed to Harrison. There are two main reasons in support of my claim. Firstly, a believer’s common understanding of religious experiences conflicts with the way in which internal pluralism understands religious belief. Such conflict implies that if internal pluralism were a sound theory, most religious beliefs would turn out to be false, and, contrary to Harrison’s intention, they would be rendered cognitively irrelevant. Secondly, internal pluralism excludes the possibility of religious disagreements. By applying to religions an epistemological approach based on conceptual schemes, doxastic dissent is actually dismantled at the cost of developing an entirely solipsistic reading of religious beliefs. In the final section of my paper, I will show that such unattractive features are consequences of the notion of conceptual scheme.
Keywords Religious Belief  Religious Pluralism  Internal Pluralism  Victoria S. Harrison  Hilary Putnam  Religious Diversity
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11406-018-0038-y
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,797
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reason, Truth and History.Kathleen Okruhlik - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (4):692-694.
Mind and Body.Hilary Putnam - 1981 - In Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge University Press.
Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience.[author unknown] - 1991 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 36 (2):117-124.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Tradizioni religiose e diversità.Daniele Bertini - 2016 - Edizioni Fondazione Centro Studi Campostrini.
Pluralism, Religious.Michael Barnes Norton - 2016 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Religious Tolerance, Diversity, and Pluralism.Peter Byrne - 2011 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 68:287-309.
Theorizing Religious Diversity in a Multicultural World.Victoria S. Harrison - 2007 - ICFAI Journal of History and Culture 1 (1):25-43.
Il pluralismo doxastico delle tradizioni religiose.Daniele Bertini - 2016 - Dialegesthai. Rivista Telematica di Filosofia 18.
Two Faces of American Pluralism: Political and Religious.Liliana Mihut - 2012 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 11 (33):39-61.


Added to PP index

Total views
27 ( #391,816 of 2,425,653 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #351,462 of 2,425,653 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes