Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):280-281 (2006)
| Abstract |
That both language and novel life-history stages are unique to humans is an interesting datum. But failure to distinguish between language and language use results in an exaggeration of the language acquisition period, which in turn vitiates claims that new developmental stages were causative factors in language evolution.
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0140525x06239062 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Significance of the Poetic in Early Childhood Education: Stanley Cavell and Lucy Sprague Mitchell on Language Learning. [REVIEW]Jeff Frank - 2012 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 31 (4):327-338.
Language and Life History: A New Perspective on the Development and Evolution of Human Language.John L. Locke & Barry Bogin - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):259-280.
Apes, Humans, and M. C. Escher: Uniqueness and Continuity in the Evolution of Language.Barbara J. King - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):289-290.
Language Evolution Without Evolution.Derek Bickerton - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):669-670.
What We Know When We Know a Language.Barry C. Smith - 2006 - In Ernest Lepore & Barry C. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press. pp. 941.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
90 ( #127,917 of 2,498,264 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #426,910 of 2,498,264 )
2009-01-28
Total views
90 ( #127,917 of 2,498,264 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #426,910 of 2,498,264 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
