Against Weatherson on How to Frame a Decision Problem

Journal of Philosophical Research 41:69-72 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Blackson.Brian Weatherson - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Research 41:73-75.
Nagel on Imagination and Physicalism.Torin Alter - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:143-158.
Nagel on imagination and physicalism.Torin Alter - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:143-58.
How to frame the free will problem.Richard Double - 1994 - Philosophical Studies 75 (1-2):149-72.
The frame problem and theories of belief.Scott Hendricks - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 129 (2):317-33.
Animals as cost‐based robots.David McFarland - 1992 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (2):133 – 153.
The Frame Problem in Ethics.Sebastian Gałecki - 2020 - Philosophical Discourses 2:53-73.
What’s the Problem with the Frame Problem?Sheldon J. Chow - 2013 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (2):309-331.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-26

Downloads
4 (#1,644,260)

6 months
72 (#73,523)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Blackson
Arizona State University

Citations of this work

Reply to Blackson.Brian Weatherson - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Research 41:73-75.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge, Bets, and Interests.Brian Weatherson - 2012 - In Jessica Brown & Mikkel Gerken (eds.), Knowledge Ascriptions. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 75--103.
A defense of stable invariantism.Baron Reed - 2010 - Noûs 44 (2):224-244.

Add more references