Animal rights, animal research, and the need to reimagine science

The New Bioethics 30 (1):63-76 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What would it look like for researchers to take non-human animal rights seriously? Recent discussions foster the impression that scientific practice needs to be reformed to make animal research ethical: just as there is ethically rigorous human research, so there can be ethically rigorous animal research. We argue that practically little existing animal research would be ethical and that ethical animal research is not scalable. Since animal research is integral to the existing scientific paradigm, taking animal rights seriously requires a radical, wholesale reimagining of science.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05340426.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,245

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Animal rights.Kay Woodward - 2005 - Milwaukee, WI: World Almanac Library.
Raising the Bar in the Justification of Animal Research.Elisa Galgut - 2015 - Journal of Animal Ethics 5 (1):5-19,.
Animal ethics in animal research.Helena Röcklinsberg - 2017 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Mickey Gjerris & Anna Olsson.
Compensation and Limits on Harm in Animal Research.Jake Earl - 2022 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 32 (3):313-327.
Why IACUCs Need Ethicists.Nathan Nobis - 2019 - ILAR Journal 60 (3):324–333.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-06

Downloads
49 (#362,055)

6 months
25 (#121,005)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher A. Bobier
Central Michigan University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations