Toward an Anti-Maleficent Research Agenda

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (1):54-58 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Important advances in biomedical and behavioral research ethics have occurred over the past few decades, many of them centered on identifying and eliminating significant harms to human subjects of research. Comprehensive attention has not been paid to the totality of harms experienced by animal subjects, although scientific and moral progress require explicit appraisal of these harms. Science is a public good and the prioritizing within, conduct of, generation of, and application of research must soundly address questions about which research is morally defensible and valuable enough to support through funding, publication, tenure, and promotion. Likewise, educational pathways of re-imagined science are critical.

Similar books and articles

Compensation and Limits on Harm in Animal Research.Jake Earl - 2022 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 32 (3):313-327.
Rethinking the Belmont Report?Phoebe Friesen, Lisa Kearns, Barbara Redman & Arthur L. Caplan - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (7):15-21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-08

Downloads
367 (#57,577)

6 months
190 (#18,746)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

L. Syd M Johnson
SUNY Upstate Medical University

References found in this work

A Belmont Report for Animals?Hope Ferdowsian, L. Syd M. Johnson, Jane Johnson, Andrew Fenton, Adam Shriver & John Gluck - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (1):19-37.
The Ethical Challenges of Animal Research.Hope R. Ferdowsian & John P. Gluck - 2015 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (4):391-406.

Add more references