Abstract
Within the cognitive sciences, most researchers assume that it is the job of linguists to investigate how language is represented, and that they do so largely by building theories based on explicit judgments about patterns of acceptability – whereas it is the task of psychologists to determine how language is processed, and that in doing so, they do not typically question the linguists' representational assumptions. We challenge this division of labor by arguing that structural priming provides an implicit method of investigating linguistic representations that should end the current reliance on acceptability judgments. Moreover, structural priming has now reached sufficient methodological maturity to provide substantial evidence about such representations. We argue that evidence from speakers' tendency to repeat their own and others' structural choices supports a linguistic architecture involving a single shallow level of syntax connected to a semantic level containing information about quantification, thematic relations, and information structure, as well as to a phonological level. Many of the linguistic distinctions often used to support complex syntactic structure are instead captured by semantics; however, the syntactic level includes some specification of “missing” elements that are not realized at the phonological level. We also show that structural priming provides evidence about the consistency of representations across languages and about language development. In sum, we propose that structural priming provides a new basis for understanding the nature of language.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x16002028
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,110
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Applicatives and Benefactives: A Cognitive Account.Masayoshi Shibatani - 1996 - In Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra Thompson (eds.), Grammatical Constructions. Clarendon Press. pp. 157--194.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Philosophical Conceptual Analysis as an Experimental Method.Michael T. Stuart - 2015 - In Thomas Gamerschlag, Doris Gerland, Rainer Osswald & Wiebke Petersen (eds.), Meaning, Frames, and Conceptual Representation. Düsseldorf University Press. pp. 267-292.
Ideal Language Philosophy and Experiments on Intuitions.Sebastian Lutz - 2009 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 2 (2):117-139.
The Art of Representation: Support for an Enactive Approach.Natika Newton - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):411-411.
A Model‐Theoretic Account of Representation.Steven French - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1472-1483.
Linguistic Norm history.V. A. Litvinov - 2013 - Liberal Arts in Russia 2 (1):94--102.
Stufen des Selbstbewusstseins: Eine Analyse von Ich-Gedanken.Gottfried Vosgerau - 2009 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 78 (1):101–130.
Representation and Development of Cognition.Hengwei Li, Huaxin Huang, Wang Xiaolu & Xiao Jiayan - 2007 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (4):583-600.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-12-02

Total views
7 ( #1,036,864 of 2,448,086 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #144,157 of 2,448,086 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes