Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40 (2017)
AbstractWithin the cognitive sciences, most researchers assume that it is the job of linguists to investigate how language is represented, and that they do so largely by building theories based on explicit judgments about patterns of acceptability – whereas it is the task of psychologists to determine how language is processed, and that in doing so, they do not typically question the linguists' representational assumptions. We challenge this division of labor by arguing that structural priming provides an implicit method of investigating linguistic representations that should end the current reliance on acceptability judgments. Moreover, structural priming has now reached sufficient methodological maturity to provide substantial evidence about such representations. We argue that evidence from speakers' tendency to repeat their own and others' structural choices supports a linguistic architecture involving a single shallow level of syntax connected to a semantic level containing information about quantification, thematic relations, and information structure, as well as to a phonological level. Many of the linguistic distinctions often used to support complex syntactic structure are instead captured by semantics; however, the syntactic level includes some specification of “missing” elements that are not realized at the phonological level. We also show that structural priming provides evidence about the consistency of representations across languages and about language development. In sum, we propose that structural priming provides a new basis for understanding the nature of language.
Similar books and articles
Don't forget the neurobiology: An experimental approach to linguistic representation.Peter Hagoort - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
Turning representation inside out: An adverbial approach to the metaphysics of language and mind.Steven F. Geisz - 2009 - Philosophical Forum 40 (4):437-471.
Structural priming and the representation of language.Holly P. Branigan & Martin J. Pickering - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
Language and Non-linguistic Thinking.Dieter Lohmar - 2012 - In Dan Zahavi (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Phenomenology. Oxford University Press.
Philosophical Conceptual Analysis as an Experimental Method.Michael T. Stuart - 2015 - In Thomas Gamerschlag, Doris Gerland, Rainer Osswald & Wiebke Petersen (eds.), Meaning, Frames, and Conceptual Representation. Düsseldorf University Press. pp. 267-292.
Ideal Language Philosophy and Experiments on Intuitions.Sebastian Lutz - 2009 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 2 (2):117-139.
The art of representation: Support for an enactive approach.Natika Newton - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):411-411.
It is there whether you hear it or not: Syntactic representation of missing arguments.Zhenguang G. Cai, Martin J. Pickering, Ruiming Wang & Holly P. Branigan - 2015 - Cognition 136 (C):255-267.
A Model‐Theoretic Account of Representation.Steven French - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1472-1483.
Language is not just speech: A functional approach to different modes of linguistic representation.Roland Harweg - forthcoming - Semiotica.
Experimental Typography, 1909-1924, and the Representation of Language.Johanna Ruth Drucker - 1986 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Neo-pragmatist (practice-based) theories of meaning.Ronald Loeffler - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (1):197-218.
Stufen des Selbstbewusstseins: Eine Analyse von Ich-Gedanken.Gottfried Vosgerau - 2009 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 78 (1):101â130.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Event Structures Drive Semantic Structural Priming, Not Thematic Roles: Evidence From Idioms and Light Verbs.Jayden Ziegler, Jesse Snedeker & Eva Wittenberg - 2018 - Cognitive Science 42 (8):2918-2949.
How broad are thematic roles? Evidence from structural priming.Jayden Ziegler & Jesse Snedeker - 2018 - Cognition 179 (C):221-240.
How abstract is syntax? Evidence from structural priming.Jayden Ziegler, Giulia Bencini, Adele Goldberg & Jesse Snedeker - 2019 - Cognition 193 (C):104045.
The role of alternative salience in the derivation of scalar implicatures.Alice Rees & Lewis Bott - 2018 - Cognition 176 (C):1-14.
Hierarchical Structure in Sequence Processing: How to Measure It and Determine Its Neural Implementation.Julia Uddén, Mauricio Jesus Dias Martins, Willem Zuidema & W. Tecumseh Fitch - 2020 - Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (3):910-924.
References found in this work
Is there a domain-general cognitive structuring system? Evidence from structural priming across music, math, action descriptions, and language.Joris Van de Cavey & Robert J. Hartsuiker - 2016 - Cognition 146 (C):172-184.
Applicatives and benefactives: A cognitive account.Masayoshi Shibatani - 1996 - In Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra Thompson (eds.), Grammatical Constructions. Clarendon Press. pp. 157--194.