Deep sequent systems for modal logic

Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (6):551-577 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We see a systematic set of cut-free axiomatisations for all the basic normal modal logics formed by some combination the axioms d, t, b, 4, 5. They employ a form of deep inference but otherwise stay very close to Gentzen’s sequent calculus, in particular they enjoy a subformula property in the literal sense. No semantic notions are used inside the proof systems, in particular there is no use of labels. All their rules are invertible and the rules cut, weakening and contraction are admissible. All systems admit a straightforward terminating proof search procedure as well as a syntactic cut elimination procedure.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deep Sequent Systems for Modal Logic.Kai Brünnler - 1998 - In Marcus Kracht, Maarten de Rijke, Heinrich Wansing & Michael Zakharyaschev (eds.), Advances in Modal Logic. CSLI Publications. pp. 107-120.
Deep Sequent Systems for Modal Logic.Kai Brünnler - 1998 - In Marcus Kracht, Maarten de Rijke, Heinrich Wansing & Michael Zakharyaschev (eds.), Advances in Modal Logic. CSLI Publications. pp. 107-120.
Syntactic cut-elimination for a fragment of the modal mu-calculus.Kai Brünnler & Thomas Studer - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (12):1838-1853.
Cut Elimination for Extended Sequent Calculi.Simone Martini, Andrea Masini & Margherita Zorzi - 2023 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 52 (4):459-495.
Syntactic cut-elimination for common knowledge.Kai Brünnler & Thomas Studer - 2009 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 160 (1):82-95.
An approach to infinitary temporal proof theory.Stefano Baratella & Andrea Masini - 2004 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 43 (8):965-990.
Cut-elimination and proof-search for bi-intuitionistic logic using nested sequents.Rajeev Goré, Linda Postniece & Alwen Tiu - 1998 - In Marcus Kracht, Maarten de Rijke, Heinrich Wansing & Michael Zakharyaschev (eds.), Advances in Modal Logic. CSLI Publications. pp. 43-66.
Locality for Classical Logic.Kai Brünnler - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (4):557-580.
Cut-elimination Theorems of Some Infinitary Modal Logics.Yoshihito Tanaka - 2001 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 47 (3):327-340.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
52 (#298,620)

6 months
16 (#217,081)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Proof Theory for Modal Logic.Sara Negri - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (8):523-538.
Prefixed tableaus and nested sequents.Melvin Fitting - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (3):291 - 313.
Supervenience, Dependence, Disjunction.Lloyd Humberstone - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy:1.
Proofs and Countermodels in Non-Classical Logics.Sara Negri - 2014 - Logica Universalis 8 (1):25-60.
Fractional-Valued Modal Logic.Mario Piazza, Gabriele Pulcini & Matteo Tesi - 2023 - Review of Symbolic Logic 16 (4):1033-1052.

View all 31 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Basic proof theory.A. S. Troelstra - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Helmut Schwichtenberg.
Proof Analysis in Modal Logic.Sara Negri - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 34 (5-6):507-544.
Display logic.Nuel D. Belnap - 1982 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (4):375-417.
The method of hypersequents in the proof theory of propositional non-classical logics.Arnon Avron - 1977 - In Wilfrid Hodges (ed.), Logic. New York: Penguin Books. pp. 1-32.
Cut-free sequent calculi for some tense logics.Ryo Kashima - 1994 - Studia Logica 53 (1):119 - 135.

View all 10 references / Add more references