boundaries. It is impossible to do good science without having an appreciation for the problems and concepts in the other levels of abstraction (at least in the direction from biology towards physics), but there are whole sets of tools, methods of analysis, theories and explanations within each discipline which do not cross those boundaries
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,219
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Drawing Lines on a Map.Barry Smith - 1995 - In A. U. Frank, W. Kuhn & D. M. Mark (eds.), Spatial Information Theory: Proceedings of COSIT '95. New York: Springer. pp. 475-484.
Desiderata for Cognitive Architectures.Ron Sun - 2004 - Philosophical Psychology 17 (3):341-373.
Today the Earwig, Tomorrow Man?David Kirsh - 1991 - Artificial Intelligence 47 (1-3):161-184.
Cognitive Architectures Have Limited Explanatory Power.Prasad Tadepalli - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):622-623.
Semantics in an Intelligent Control System.A. Sloman - 1994 - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Physical Sciences and Engineering 349:43-58.


Added to PP index

Total views
314 ( #28,971 of 2,448,423 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,843 of 2,448,423 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes