Egalitarianism, ideals, and cosmopolitan justice

Philosophical Forum 36 (1):1–30 (2005)
Gillian Brock
University of Auckland
Cosmopolitans believe that all human beings have equal moral worth and that our responsibilities to others do not stop at borders. Various cosmopolitans offer different interpretations of how we should understand what is entailed by that equal moral worth and what responsibilities we have to each other in taking our equality seriously. Two suggestions are that a cosmopolitan should endorse a 'global difference principle' and a 'principle of global equality of opportunity'. In the first part of this paper I examine whether these two suggestions are compelling. I argue against a global difference principle, but for an alternative 'needs-based minimum floor principle' (where these are not coextensive, as I explain). I develop a model of cosmopolitan justice, which allows us to address not only matters of global distributive justice, but other global justice issues as well. Though I support what I refer to as a negative version of the global equality of opportunity principle, I argue that a more positive version of the ideal remains elusive. In the second part of this paper, I reflect on what bearing these results have on two central sets of questions: First, what kind of ideal are we after in the domain of cosmopolitan justice and what practical implications can we reasonably expect from it? Second, what sort of ideal of egalitarianism is compelling and does my model of cosmopolitan justice adequately reflect the legitimate concerns of egalitarians?
Keywords equality of opportunity  difference principle  global difference principle  equality
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9191.2005.00186.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,515
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229-243.
Human Functioning and Social Justice.Martha C. Nussbaum - 1992 - Political Theory 20 (2):202-246.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Global Egalitarianism.Chris Armstrong - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (1):155-171.
Humanitarian Intervention: Closing the Gap Between Theory and Practice.Gillian Brock - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (3):277–291.
Global Distributive Justice, Entitlement, and Desert.Gillian Brock - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (sup1):109-138.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total downloads
97 ( #63,427 of 2,268,176 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #106,489 of 2,268,176 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature