Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (6-7):6-7 (2003)
AbstractThis paper consists of two parts. In the first, we discuss the neuropsychological correlates of belief in a 'paranormal' or magical causation of coincidences. In particular, we review experimental evidence demonstrating that believers in ESP and kindred forms of paranormal phenomena differ from disbelievers with respect to indices of sequential response production and semantic-associative processing. Not only do believers judge artificial coincidences as more 'meaningful' than disbelievers, they also more strongly suppress coincidental productions (i.e. repetitions) in their generation of random sequences. These findings illuminate the cognitive mechanisms underlying the formation and maintenance of paranormal beliefs for which the right cerebral hemisphere is hypothesized to play a central role. These same right hemispheric semantic-associative processing characteristics are centrally implicated in the creative thought process as well as the genesis of delusional (pathological) beliefs (e.g. ideas of reference).
Similar books and articles
Report of a Minor Investigation of Extra-Sensory Perception.K. H. Baker - 1937 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 21 (1):120.
Inferring Beliefs as Subjectively Imprecise Probabilities.Steffen Andersen, John Fountain, Glenn W. Harrison, Arne Risa Hole & E. Elisabet Rutström - 2012 - Theory and Decision 73 (1):161-184.
An Experimental Analysis of the Law of Effect.H. Wallach & M. Henle - 1941 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 28 (4):340.
Introducing the Modified Paranormal Belief Scale: Distinguishing Between Classic Paranormal Beliefs, Religious Paranormal Beliefs and Conventional Religiosity Among Undergraduates in Northern Ireland and Wales.Emyr Williams, Christopher Lewis & Leslie Francis - 2009 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 31 (3):345-356.
Probability Logic of Finitely Additive Beliefs.Chunlai Zhou - 2010 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19 (3):247-282.
A Primacy Effect in Subjective Probability Revision.Cameron R. Peterson & Wesley M. Ducharme - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (1):61.
The Influence of Clause Order, Congruency, and Probability on the Processing of Conditionals.Matthew Haigh & Andrew J. Stewart - 2011 - Thinking and Reasoning 17 (4):402 - 423.
A Theory of Probability.T. V. Reeves - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (2):161-182.
Does Paranormal Perception Occur in Near-Death Experiences?Keith Augustine - 2007 - Journal of Near Death Studies 25 (4):203-236.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
DMT Models the Near-Death Experience.Christopher Timmermann, Leor Roseman, Luke Williams, David Erritzoe, Charlotte Martial, Héléna Cassol, Steven Laureys, David Nutt & Robin Carhart-Harris - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
Toward a Better Understanding of the Relationship Between Belief in the Paranormal and Statistical Bias: The Potential Role of Schizotypy.Neil Dagnall, Andrew Denovan, Kenneth Drinkwater, Andrew Parker & Peter Clough - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
Paranormal Belief and Errors of Probabilistic Reasoning: The Role of Constituent Conditional Relatedness in Believers' Susceptibility to the Conjunction Fallacy.Paul Rogers, John E. Fisk & Emma Lowrie - 2017 - Consciousness and Cognition 56:13-29.
Implicit Learning of Sequential Bias in a Guessing Task: Failure to Demonstrate Effects of Dopamine Administration and Paranormal Belief☆.John Palmer, Christine Mohr, Peter Krummenacher & Peter Brugger - 2007 - Consciousness and Cognition 16 (2):498-506.
References found in this work
No references found.