A Single True Morality? The Challenge of Relativism

Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 40:73-85 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ethical objectivists hold that there is one and only one correct system of moral beliefs. From such a standpoint it follows that conflicting basic moral principles cannot both be true and that the only moral principles which are binding on rational human agents are those described by the single true morality. However sincerely they may be held, all other moral principles are incorrect. Objectivism is an influential tradition, covering most of the rationalist and naturalist standpoints which have dominated nineteenth and twentieth century moral philosophy: there is widespread agreement amongst relativists themselves that objectivism is firmly rooted in common sense.

Similar books and articles

Relativism Refuted?R. B. Brandt - 1984 - The Monist 67 (3):297-307.
Aspects of Folk Morality: Objectivism and Relativism.Hagop Sarkissian - 2016 - In Wesley Buckwalter & Justin Sytsma (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Experimental Philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell. pp. 212–224.
System relativism.Charles Sayward - 1988 - Ratio 1 (2):163-175.
Moral Relativism.Torbjörn Tännsjö - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 135 (2):123-143.
A Critique of Harman’s Empiric Relativism.Byron L. Haines - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:97-107.
Moral relativism and pluralism.David B. Wong - 2023 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
A Critique of Harman’s Empiric Relativism.Byron L. Haines - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:97-107.
The Empirical Case for Folk Indexical Moral Relativism.James R. Beebe - forthcoming - Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy 4.
Moral Relativism.Qun Gong - 2009 - Philosophy and Culture 36 (6):29-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-23

Downloads
533 (#36,600)

6 months
225 (#13,877)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Harry Bunting
University of Ulster

Citations of this work

Metaethics.Geoff Sayre-McCord - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references