The Harmful and Residual Effects on Civilians by Bombing Dual-purpose Facilities

Journal of Military Ethics 15 (2):81-99 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis article addresses what we owe to the civilians of a state with which we are militarily engaged. The old notion of noncombatant immunity needs to be rethought within the context of both human rights and into the postwar phase. No doubt, civilians will be killed in war. However, much more can be done during and after the fighting to protect civilians’ basic human rights from the ills of war. I argue for making belligerents accountable ex post by requiring them to repair destroyed dual-purpose facilities that are essential for securing basic human rights of the civilian populace. I argue also that a belligerent’s targeting decisions should be reviewed ex post by an impartial commission.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-29

Downloads
15 (#948,666)

6 months
4 (#1,006,062)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Todd Burkhardt
University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The law of peoples.John Rawls - 1999 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Edited by John Rawls.
The Law of Peoples.John Rawls - 1993 - Critical Inquiry 20 (1):36-68.
Just and Unjust Wars.M. Walzer - 1979 - Philosophy 54 (209):415-420.
War and massacre.Thomas Nagel - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (2):123-144.

View all 6 references / Add more references