Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (2):305-309 (2013)

Authors
Abstract
In this paper, I will argue that the current discussions about regulating certain activities concerning the pharmaceutical industry do miss a crucial point. The Pharmaceutical Industry is a story of success, providing a wealth of new discoveries and applied technologies, which have greatly enhanced our lives. The current call for strict regulation of the Pharmaceutical Industry makes the unwarranted assumption that such regulation will not disturb the mechanisms of the Industry’s success. I will claim that a centralised regulation profoundly transforms the direction of travel. I will also claim that the role of the executive in bypassing regulations creates a parallel industry of subsidiary regulations to counter such bypassing. The predictable consequence is the increasing role of central regulatory control and the progressive slowing down of the success of the Pharmaceutical Industry leading towards an undesirable mediocrity. The conclusion I wish to advance is that our choices are not limited to ‘a wild open market’ and ‘a regulated open market’ scenarios, and the strategy to avoid a robustly regulated but mediocre Pharmaceutical Industry may involve ‘non-open market scenarios’ which have so far been absent from the alternatives discussed
Keywords Bureaucracy  Central planning  Executive role/motivation/behaviour  Ideology  Pharmaceutical industry  Political economy of health  Regulation
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11019-012-9384-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,789
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Towards a Genealogy of Pharmacological Practice.Ricardo Camargo & Nicolás Ried - 2016 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (1):85-94.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Big Pharma: A Former Insider’s View. [REVIEW]David Badcott - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (2):249-264.
Mulesing and Animal Ethics.Joanne Sneddon & Bernard Rollin - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (4):371-386.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-03-07

Total views
38 ( #272,887 of 2,425,673 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #190,322 of 2,425,673 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes