The Architecture of Cognition: Rethinking Fodor and Pylyshyn's Systematicity Challenge

MIT Press (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophers and cognitive scientists reassess systematicity in the post-connectionist era, offering perspectives from ecological psychology, embodied and distributed cognition, enactivism, and other methodologies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fodor and Pylyshyn on connectionism.Michael V. Antony - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (3):321-41.
Systematicity, conceptual truth, and evolution.Brian P. McLaughlin - 1992 - Philosophy and the Cognitive Sciences 34:217-234.
Systematicity, structured representations and cognitive architecture: A reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn.Andy Clark - 1991 - In Terence E. Horgan & John L. Tienson (eds.), Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 198--218.
Cognition, systematicity, and nomic necessity.Robert F. Hadley - 1997 - Mind and Language 12 (2):137-53.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-06

Downloads
66 (#242,352)

6 months
11 (#226,317)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Paco Calvo Garzon
University of Murcia
John Symons
University of Kansas
John Symons
University of Kansas

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references