- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Time, flow, and space
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42 (2019)
Abstract
Does a temporal dual process theory explain the illusive flow of time? I point out one shortcoming of such a theory and propose an alternative that does not require either dual cognitive processes or demand such a stark asymmetry between space and time in the brain.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
How to Get out of the Labyrinth of Time? Lessons Drawn from Callender.Jerzy Gołosz - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy:1-24.
On believing that time does not flow, but thinking that it seems to.Kristie Miller, Alex Holcombe & Andrew J. Latham - 2019 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42.
Interdisciplinary perspectives on the flow of time.Dean Rickles & Maria Kon - 2014 - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1326 (1):1-8.
Neurophysics of the Flow of Time.Ronald Gruber - 2008 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 29 (3):241-255.
Does branching explain flow of time or the other way around?Petr Švarný - 2015 - Synthese 192 (7):2273-2292.
Flow of time.Dean Rickles (ed.) - 2014 - Hoboken, NJ: Published by Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-12-13
Downloads
48 (#340,493)
6 months
21 (#133,706)
2019-12-13
Downloads
48 (#340,493)
6 months
21 (#133,706)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman - 1983 - Psychological Review 90 (4):293-315.
The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.Steven A. Sloman - 1996 - Psychological Bulletin 119 (1):3-22.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-kfj6z uwo