The "strong programme", normativity, and social causes

Abstract
Barry Barnes and David Bloor of the Strong Programme of the sociology of knowledge advance a naturalized epistemology that reduces all accounts of normativity to social causes. I endorse their program of naturalizing one kind of normativity, but I argue that there is another kind they cannot naturalize. Within the context of sociological explanations of rationality, there are norms of rationality instantiated by scientists that Barnes and Bloor study, and Barnes and Bloor's own normative ascriptions of scientists as rational beings. I argue that Barnes and Bloor successfully justify their naturalization of the norms of rationality of the scientists they describe by a methodological caution and arguments from under-determination and finitism. But they inevitably fail to naturalize their own normative ascriptions of those scientists as rational
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00355.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,727
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge University Press.
Ontological Relativity and Other Essays.W. V. Quine - 1969 - Columbia University Press.
The Fate of Knowledge.Helen Longino - 2002 - Princeton University Press.
Knowledge and Social Imagery.David Bloor - 1991 - University of Chicago Press.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
How Strong is Dr. Bloor's 'Strong Programme'?Gad Freudenthal - 1979 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 10 (1):67-83.
Bad Arguments Against a Good Case (Laudan's Attack on the Strong Programme).Márta Fehér - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (3):233-238.
Reasons, Causes, and the 'Strong Programme' in the Sociology of Knowledge.Warren Schmaus - 1985 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 15 (2):189-196.
Bloor's Bluff: Behaviourism and the Strong Programme.Peter Slezak - 1991 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (3):241 – 256.
The Social Construction of Social Constructionism.Peter Slezak - 1994 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):139 – 157.
Can Relativism Be Reconciled with Realism and Causalism?Barbara Tuchańska - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (3):285-294.
Realism, Reliabilism, and the 'Strong Programme' in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.Jeff Kochan - 2008 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (1):21 – 38.
Toward a Monistic Theory of Science: The `Strong Programme' Reconsidered.Stephen Kemp - 2003 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (3):311-338.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
29 ( #182,997 of 2,197,326 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #299,047 of 2,197,326 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature