- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Raqeeb, Haastrup, and Evans: Seeking Consistency through a Distributive Justice-Based Approach to Limitation of Treatment in the Context of Dispute
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 50 (1):169-180 (2022)
Abstract
When is life-sustaining treatment not in the best interests of a minimally conscious child? This is an extremely difficult question that incites seemingly intractable debate. And yet, it is the question courts in England and Wales have set out to answer in disputes about appropriate medical treatment for children.Author Profiles
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Effects of Introducing a Harm Threshold for Medical Treatment Decisions for Children in the Courts of England & Wales: An (Inter)National Case Law Analysis.Veronica M. E. Neefjes - forthcoming - Health Care Analysis:1-17.
Just dying: the futility of futility.Julian Savulescu - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):583-584.
Disputes about the Withdrawal of Treatment: The Role of the Courts.Loane Skene - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (4):701-707.
Disputes about the Withdrawal of Treatment: The Role of the Courts.Loane Skene - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (4):701-707.
Praying for Relief from Parens Patriae: Should a Child be Allowed to Refuse Life-Saving Medical Treatment on Religious Grounds?David Kessler - 1986 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 2 (2):673-694.
Charlie Gard: in defence of the law.Eliana Close, Lindy Willmott & Benjamin P. White - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (7):476-480.
If you ask the wrong question, you'll get the wrong answer.Charles Foster - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):578-578.
Deficiencies and Missed Opportunities to Formulate Clinical Guidelines in Australia for Withholding or Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment in Severely Disabled and Impaired Infants.Neera Bhatia & James Tibballs - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (3):449-459.
Re Imogen: the role of the Family Court of Australia in disputes over gender dysphoria treatment.Michelle Taylor-Sands & Georgina Dimopoulos - 2021 - Monash Bioethics Review 39 (Suppl 1):42-66.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-04-08
Downloads
14 (#1,019,271)
6 months
10 (#308,797)
2022-04-08
Downloads
14 (#1,019,271)
6 months
10 (#308,797)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
The role of bioethics services in paediatric intensive care units: a qualitative descriptive study.Denise Alexander, Mary Quirke, Jo Greene, Lorna Cassidy, Carol Hilliard & Maria Brenner - 2024 - BMC Medical Ethics 25 (1):1-12.
Consciousness, Conflations, and Disability Rights: Denials of Care for Children in the “Minimally Conscious State”.Joseph J. Fins - 2022 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 50 (1):181-183.
References found in this work
It is never lawful or ethical to withdraw life-sustaining treatment from patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness.Charles Foster - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (4):265-270.
Why Charlie Gard’s parents should have been the decision-makers about their son’s best interests.Raanan Gillon - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (7):462-465.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-sz9d2 uwo