Law and Philosophy 31 (4):409-441 (2012)

Damiano Canale
Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi
This article critically focuses on the methodological aspects of Scott Shapiro’s book Legality . Indeed Shapiro’s book sets out several original theses about not only the nature of law and the main problems of jurisprudence, but also about how the nature of law can be discovered by jurisprudence. In this sense, the method of inquiry adopted by Shapiro can be considered as one of the most challenging outcomes of his research. The article is divided into two parts. In the first two sections I shall analyze Shapiro’s jurisprudential approach by focusing on its resort to metaphysical vocabulary, conceptual analysis, constructive reasoning, and institutional explanation of law. In the following sections I will consider some of the problems that this approach gives rise to, and outline an alternative view on the nature of law stimulated by the discussion of Shapiro’s work.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10982-011-9125-y
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,981
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason.Michael Bratman - 1987 - Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

View all 41 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Is Law Grounded in Joint Action?Damiano Canale - 2014 - Rechtstheorie 45 (3):289-312.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
46 ( #223,279 of 2,427,507 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #533,878 of 2,427,507 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes