Philosophical Investigations 31 (3):197–226 (2008)

Authors
Leo Cheung
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Abstract
This paper aims to argue against the resolute reading, and offer a correct way of reading Wittgenstein'sTractatus. According to the resolute reading, nonsense can neither say nor show anything. The Tractatus does not advance any theory of meaning, nor does it adopt the notion of using signs in contravention of logical syntax. Its sentences, except a few constituting the frame, are all nonsensical. Its aim is merely to liberate nonsense utterers from nonsense. I argue that these points are either not distinctive from standard interpretations or incorrect. Instead, the Tractarian elucidations help to shed light on the nature of language and logic, and introduce the correct method in philosophy. Philosophy deals with philosophical utterances and Tractarian elucidations by pointing out that they are nonsensical. By doing this, one is helped to see that what they appear to be saying is shown by significant propositions saying something else.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9205.2008.00344.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,608
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 47 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On the Unintelligibility of Wittgenstein's Tractatus.Cameron Hessell - 2013 - Philosophical Investigations 36 (2):113-154.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The New Wittgenstein: A Critique.Ian Proops - 2001 - European Journal of Philosophy 9 (3):375–404.
The New Wittgenstein (Review). [REVIEW]Anton Alterman - 2001 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (3):456-457.
Ineffability and Nonsense.A. W. Moore - 2003 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):169–193.
Ineffability and Nonsense.Peter Sullivan - 2003 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):195–223.
On the 'Resolute' Reading of the Tractatus.John Koethe - 2003 - Philosophical Investigations 26 (3):187–204.
Contextualism and Nonsense in Wittgenstein's Tractatus.Edmund Dain - 2006 - South African Journal of Philosophy 25 (2):91-101.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
178 ( #51,386 of 2,385,941 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #204,180 of 2,385,941 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes