Philosophy Study 5 (10):530-536 (2015)

The notion of suffering carries with it aspects which are private and individual on the one hand and social and lingual on the other. I would pay attention to the latter part of the suffering notion, where the notion of suffering is recognized to be primitive by almost all the theories of human values. This primitive character allows a commensurable basis on the basis of which most plural theories share something in common to talk objectively to each other. In this paper I would like to offer three arguments in order to advance a thesis that one’s suffering is redemptive of others First, the conservation law of mass says that matter of a closed system can neither be created nor destroyed, although it may be differently rearranged. This may be applied to the experience of suffering, to allow the conservation law of suffering: my unjust self-interest costs pains in others to the level of the same amount but if I voluntarily suffer a sacrifice others will have their pains lightened to the analogous level. Second, notion of yin-yang helps to support the redemptive thesis of suffering. The notion says that all things in the reality consist of two complementary opposite capacities that interact within a greater whole, as part of a dynamic system. Then, my acceptance of suffering and the decrease of other’s pain are two complementary capacities of one reality. Third, any person is responsible for his own act, so is a society as a whole. Then, as an individual restores his damaged person, when he commits a crime, by being suffered or punished, a society restores itself to its own proper state, when any member of the society is wronged, by suffering communally in one way or other.
Keywords solidarity  sharing  responsibility  yin-yang  conservation
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2015
DOI 10.17265/2159-5313/2015.10.006
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Ethics of Respect for Nature.Paul W. Taylor - 1981 - Environmental Ethics 3 (3):197-218.
A Redemptive Analysis of Suffering.Daihyun Chung - 2015 - Philosophy Study 5 (10):530-536.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Redemptive Analysis of Suffering.Daihyun Chung - 2015 - Philosophy Study 5 (10):530-536.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Does God Suffer?Thomas Weinandy - 2002 - Ars Disputandi 2 (1):1-13.
Levinas on Suffering and Solidarity.Y. A. Kang - 1997 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 59 (3):482 - 504.
Suffering in the Clinical Setting.Danny Lee Franke - 1994 - Dissertation, The University of Tennessee
On the Suffering of Compassion.Peter Nilsson - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (1):125-144.
Divine Punishment and Reconciliation.J. Brenton Stearns - 1981 - Journal of Religious Ethics 9 (1):118-130.
Human Suffering as a Challenge for the Meaning of Life.Ulrich Diehl - 2009 - Existenz. An International Journal in Philosophy, Religion, Politics, and the Arts.
Suffering: No Dogs or Philosophers Allowed.[author unknown] - forthcoming - DVD.
Suffering and Moral Responsibility.Jamie Mayerfeld - 1999 - Oxford University Press.
Animal Suffering: An Evolutionary Approach.Gill Aitken - 2008 - Environmental Values 17 (2):165-180.
The Myth of the Control of Suffering.Reuven Sobel - 1996 - Journal of Medical Humanities 17 (4):255-259.
The Sense of Suffering.Mary C. Rawlinson - 1986 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (1):39-62.


Added to PP index

Total views
302 ( #24,666 of 2,348,797 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #32,896 of 2,348,797 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes