Deconstructing the Laws of Logic

Philosophy 83 (1):25-53 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I consider reasons for questioning ‘the laws of logic’, and suggest that these laws do not accord with everyday reality. Either they are rhetorical tools rather than absolute truths, or else Plato and his successors were right to think that they identify a reality distinct from the ordinary world of experience, and also from the ultimate source of reality.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Laws and the Completeness of the Fundamental.Martin Glazier - 2016 - In Mark Jago (ed.), Reality Making. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 11-37.
The ontic status of the laws of nature.Brenda De Wet - 2007 - South African Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):122-132.
Objectivity and Natural Laws.Gal Yehezkel - 2013 - Analysis and Metaphysics 12:116–132.
Frege on the Generality of Logical Laws.Jim Hutchinson - 2020 - European Journal of Philosophy (2):1-18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-21

Downloads
27 (#577,964)

6 months
1 (#1,722,767)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen R. L. Clark
University of Liverpool

References found in this work

On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
Against Method.P. Feyerabend - 1975 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (4):331-342.
Doubt Truth to Be a Liar.Graham Priest - 2007 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 13 (4):541-544.

View all 14 references / Add more references