Medical Ethics at Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib: The Problem of Dual Loyalty

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (3):570-580 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although knowledge of torture and physical and psychological abuse was widespread at both the Guantanamo Bay detention facility and Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, and known to medical personnel, there was no official report before the January 2004 Army investigation of military health personnel reporting abuse, degradation, or signs of torture. Mounting information from many sources, including Pentagon documents, the International Committee of the Red Cross, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, etc., indicate that medical personnel failed to maintain medical records, conduct routine medical examinations, provide proper care of disabled and injured detainees, accurately report illnesses and injuries, and falsified medical records and death certificates. Medical personnel and medical information was also used to design and implement psychologically and physically coercive interrogations. The United States military medical system failed to protect detainee's human rights, violated the basic principles of medical ethics and ignored the basic tenets of medical professionalism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Weaponising medicine: "Tutti fratelli," no more.T. Koch - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (5):249-255.
Care or Complicity? Medical Personnel in Prisons.Rebecca L. Walker - 2024 - Hastings Center Report 54 (1):2-2.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
40 (#387,669)

6 months
8 (#506,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Clark
University of Melbourne

References found in this work

Universal Declaration of Human Rights.United Nations - 1948 - Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 21 (1-2):153-160.

Add more references