Concepts, Images, Determination. Some remarks on the understanding of Transcendental Philosophy by McDowell and Fichte

Fichte-Studien 48:109-130 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

McDowell in Mind and World developed a post-transcendental understanding of some core philosophical puzzles of subjectivity, like consciousness, conceptual capacity and perception. One of the main assumptions in the background of his philosophical proposal is that all our possible experience has to be determined and therefore has to be acknowledged as conceptual, therefore this very experience has to be both relational and representational.After this statement of conceptual experience in the early 2000’s a debate started which still involves philosophers like Brandom, Gaskin, Wright, Heck, Stalnaker, Peacocke, Dreyfus.The discussion in the beginning was focused on the definition of the Space of Reasons, what is most lively today is the epistemological uncertainty of the possibility of perceiving imagines in a reductive view as perceptual experience. The proposal of McDowell is a quasi-Hegelian understanding of concepts. I think that is possible an alternative path, moving from a new understanding of conceptual spontaneity and of the determination in general, rooted in J. G. Fichte Sittenlehre and in the general framework of the Wissenschaftslehre in a broader and more nuanced understanding of the postkantian transcendental philosophy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-03-16

Downloads
14 (#1,020,370)

6 months
1 (#1,516,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Giovanni Cogliandro
Università degli Studi "Tor Vergata" (Roma)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references