Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):665-670 (2014)

Authors
Katja Diefenbach
Humboldt-University, Berlin
Abstract
Background Intestinal transplant in infants with severe short bowel syndrome (SBS) is an emerging therapy, yet without sufficient long-term data or established guidelines, resulting in possible variation in practice. Objectives To assess current attitudes and counselling practices among physicians regarding intestinal transplant in infants with SBS, and to determine whether counselling and management vary between subspecialists or centres. Methods A national sample of practicing paediatric surgeons and neonatologists was surveyed via the American Academy of Paediatrics listserves. Results were analysed by physician subspecialty and again by presence or absence of intestinal transplant at respondent's centre. Results The survey was completed by 433 respondents, consisting of 363 neonatologists and 70 paediatric surgeons. Fifty-seven respondents (13.2%) practiced at a centre that performed intestinal transplants in children. The vast majority of respondents (91% for preterm, 95% for term neonates) felt that maintaining a neonate with SBS on total parenteral nutrition for intestinal transplant was ethically optional (neither impermissible nor obligatory), and that parents should be given an informed choice whether to pursue that option. However, only 33% indicated they often/always offer intestinal transplant as a treatment option to families in this situation. Conclusions There is a marked disparity between individual physicians’ beliefs regarding the acceptability of intestinal transplant for severe SBS and their reported practice. Wide variability exists among physicians with respect to their knowledge, beliefs and practice regarding severe SBS, raising concerns about transparency and justice. Survival data prior to transplant, currently unavailable, are essential to rational decision making and informed parental permission
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2012-101269
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,199
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Shades of Grey.D. J. C. Wilkinson - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):671-672.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Transplant: A Non-Fiction Narrative.M. Rowe - 2002 - Medical Humanities 28 (1):23-27.
Commentary.Robert Gatter - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (3):377-378.
What Actually Happened.Mark G. Kuczewski - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (3):380-381.
Selection of Recipients for Donor Organs in Transplant Medicine.Volker H. Schmidt - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (1):50 – 74.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-22

Total views
5 ( #1,138,495 of 2,412,036 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #538,761 of 2,412,036 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes