Knowing Reasons

In Ethics without principles. New York: Oxford University Press (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A chapter on moral epistemology. Asks what, for the particularist, will count as a basic moral fact. Considers the modal status of such facts, arguing that they are contingent, but known a priori. Claims that this position is neither foundationalist nor coherentist. Ends by considering various suggestions that particularism cannot avoid some form of general scepticism in ethics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan Dancy
University of Texas at Austin

Citations of this work

What Do Reasons Do?Jonathan Dancy - 2003 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (S1):95-113.
What Do Reasons Do?Jonathan Dancy - 2003 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (S1):95-113.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references