A Reply to Arnold's Reply

Economics and Philosophy 3 (2):331 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Professor Arnold's reply to my reply seems not to have touched the substance of my argument. Perhaps I have been unclear. Arnold contends that any form of market socialism, if unchecked by central authorities, would revert to a system essentially undistinguishable from capitalism. Against this contention I have argued that a democratic, worker-controlled, market socialism that generates its investment fund by taxation exhibits no such tendency. Specifically, I argued that in such a society 1. there exists no tendency for socialized property to revert to private property ; 2. the ability of private individuals to accumulate vast wealth is sharply curtailed ; 3. the authority structures within enterprises are much more democratic than under capitalism; 4. intra-firm income differentials will be far more egalitarian than under capitalism

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
30 (#520,961)

6 months
6 (#700,872)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Schweickart
Loyola University, Chicago

Citations of this work

Final Reply to Professor Schweickart.N. Scott Arnold - 1987 - Economics and Philosophy 3 (2):335.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Preface to Economic Democracy.Robert H. Dahl (ed.) - 1985 - University of California Press.
The New Industrial State.John Kenneth Galbraith - 1968 - Science and Society 32 (2):244-253.

Add more references