Economics and Philosophy 6 (1):139-146 (1990)

Abstract
In a recent examination of the origins of ordinal utility theory in neoclassical economics, Robert D. Cooter and Peter Rappoport argue that the ordinalist revolution of the 1930s, after which most economists abandoned interpersonal utility comparisons as normative and unscientific, constituted neither unambiguous progress in economic science nor the abandonment of normative theorizing, as many economists and historians of economic thought have generally believed. Rather, the widespread acceptance of ordinalism, with its focus on Pareto optimality, simply represented the emergence of a new neoclassical research agenda that, on the one hand, defined economics differently than had the material welfare theorists of the cardinal utility school and, on the other, adopted a positivist methodology in contrast to the less restrictive empiricism of the cardinalists.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0266267100000687
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,232
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Language, Truth, and Logic.A. J. Ayer - 1936 - London: V. Gollancz.
Ethics and Language.Charles L. Stevenson - 1945 - American Mathematical Society.
Language, Truth and Logic. 2nd edition.A. J. Ayer - 1952 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 142:256-256.
Utilitarianism and Beyond.Amartya Sen & Bernard Williams (eds.) - 1982 - Cambridge University Press.
Persuasive Definitions.Charles Leslie Stevenson - 1938 - Mind 47 (187):331-350.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Mark Blaug on the Normativity of Welfare Economics.D. Wade Hands - 2013 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):1-25.
Value-Ladenness in Economics: Reply to Rosenbaum.John B. Davis - 1996 - Journal of Economic Methodology 3 (1):121-125.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Making Interpersonal Comparisons Coherently.Martin Barrett & Daniel Hausman - 1990 - Economics and Philosophy 6 (2):293.
Making Sense of Economists' Positive-Normative Distinction.David Colander & Huei-Chun Su - 2015 - Journal of Economic Methodology 22 (2):157-170.
The Project of a Personalistic Economics.Luk Bouckaert - 1999 - Ethical Perspectives 6 (1):20-33.
Positive Public Economics: Reinterpreting ‘Optimal’ Policies.Brian C. Albrecht - 2017 - Journal of Economic Methodology 24 (1):90-103.
The Problematic Welfare Standards of Behavioral Paternalism.Douglas Glen Whitman & Mario J. Rizzo - 2015 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (3):409-425.
6 The Normative Significance of the Individual in Economics.John B. Davis - 2006 - In Betsy Jane Clary, Wilfred Dolfsma & Deborah M. Figart (eds.), Ethics and the Market: Insights From Social Economics. Routledge. pp. 69.
Identity Problems: An Interview with John B. Davis.Thomas R. Wells & John B. Davis - 2012 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):81-103.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-10

Total views
28 ( #348,267 of 2,329,901 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #393,046 of 2,329,901 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes