Journal of Military Ethics 20 (3-4):180-199 (2022)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
This article is a result of a unique project that brought together academics and military practitioners with a mind to addressing difficult moral questions in a way that is philosophically careful,...
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1080/15027570.2021.2018176 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Autonomous Machines, Moral Judgment, and Acting for the Right Reasons.Duncan Purves, Ryan Jenkins & Bradley J. Strawser - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (4):851-872.
Ethics of Human Enhancement: An Executive Summary. [REVIEW]Fritz Allhoff, Patrick Lin & Jesse Steinberg - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2):201-212.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Enhancement.Thomas Murray - 2009 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
Enhancement in Sport, and Enhancement Outside Sport.Thomas Douglas - 2007 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 1 (1).
Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. [REVIEW]Nick Bostrom - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):311-341.
An Argument Against Arguments for Enhancement: The Treatment-Enhancement Distinction is Difficult to Make, and Defenders of Enhancement Often Base Their Case on That. Critics of Enhancement, However, Often Have Prototypical Cases of Enhancement-Oriented Interventions in Mind, and the Ethics of These Can Be Evaluated on a Case by Case Basis. Things Like Intelligence Enhancement May Have Adverse Effects on Equality and Utility. If the Equality and Utility Effects of Such Enhancements Were Sufficiently Severe, Then Restrictions Would Be Called For. We Need to Think More About How to Make Tradeoffs Between Liberty, Equality, and Utility—and We Need to Know More About the Extent to Which Each of These is at Stake—Before Reaching Conclusions About the Ethics of, and Appropriate Social Policy Regarding, Human Enhancement. [REVIEW]Michael Selgelid - 2007 - Law and Ethics of Human Rights 1 (1).
The Ethics of Genetic Cognitive Enhancement: Gene Editing or Embryo Selection?Marcelo de Araujo - 2020 - Philosophies 5 (20):20-0.
Towards a Moderate Stance on Human Enhancement.Nikil Mukerji & Julian Nida-Rümelin - 2014 - Humana Mente 7 (26):17-33.
Super Soldiers and Technological Asymmetry.Robert Mark Simpson - 2015 - In J. Galliott & M. Lotz (eds.), Super Soldiers: Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications. Ashgate: Ashgate. pp. 81-91.
Risk, War, and the Dangers of Soldier Identity.Michael Robillard - 2017 - Journal of Military Ethics 16 (3-4):205-219.
Shields of Humanity – the Ethical Constraints of Professional Combatants.Hanne A. Kraugerud - 2011 - Journal of Military Ethics 10 (4):263-273.
Human Enhancement: Arguments From Virtue Ethics.Jan-Hendrik Heinrichs & Mandy Stake - 2019 - Zeitschrift Für Ethik Und Moralphilosophie 2 (2):355-373.
Soldier 2.0: Military Human Enhancement and International Law.Heather A. Harrison Dinniss & Jann K. Kleffner - 2018 - In Wolff Heintschel von Heinegg, Robert Frau & Tassilo Singer (eds.), Dehumanization of Warfare: Legal Implications of New Weapon Technologies. Springer Verlag. pp. 163-205.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2022-01-20
Total views
17 ( #635,925 of 2,506,112 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #49,569 of 2,506,112 )
2022-01-20
Total views
17 ( #635,925 of 2,506,112 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #49,569 of 2,506,112 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
