Measuring inconsistency in probabilistic logic: rationality postulates and Dutch book interpretation

Artificial Intelligence 227 (C):140-164 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-22

Downloads
13 (#1,041,284)

6 months
9 (#437,668)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Why be coherent?Glauber De Bona & Julia Staffel - 2018 - Analysis 78 (3):405-415.
Graded Incoherence for Accuracy-Firsters.Glauber De Bona & Julia Staffel - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (2):189-213.
Should I pretend I'm perfect?Julia Staffel - 2017 - Res Philosophica 94 (2):301-324.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

A theory of diagnosis from first principles.Raymond Reiter - 1987 - Artificial Intelligence 32 (1):57-95.
Coherence and the axioms of confirmation.Abner Shimony - 1955 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (1):1-28.
Fair bets and inductive probabilities.John G. Kemeny - 1955 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (3):263-273.
Probabilistic logic.Nils J. Nilsson - 1986 - Artificial Intelligence 28 (1):71-87.

View all 15 references / Add more references