Journal of Business Ethics 76 (3):309 - 318 (2007)
Since there have been many recent occurrences of alleged wrongdoing by business persons and other professionals, it seems additional ethics research is needed to obtain knowledge that will impact real-world behavior. An empirical study assessed business students’ impressions of hypothetical wrongdoers and whistleblowers. To some extent, impressions of an unethical executive and a whistleblower were influenced by the same variables and in opposite directions. Female respondents judged the unethical executive less favorably and the whistleblower more favorably than did males. The executive was rated less favorably and the whistleblower more favorably when the executive sought a small gain than when the goal was a large gain or prevention of a loss of either magnitude. Some manipulations, however, impacted impressions of one actor, but not the other. Perhaps ethics training can make students aware that issue␣framing and moral intensity components may bias decisions.
|Keywords||attributions decision-making bias ethical judgments moral intensity whistle-blowing|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Moral Reasoning and Business Ethics: Implications for Research, Education, and Management. [REVIEW]Linda Klebe Trevino - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (5-6):445 - 459.
The Impact of Moral Intensity on Decision Making in a Business Context.Bernhard F. Frey - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 26 (3):181 - 195.
The Role of Moral Intensity in Ethical Decision Making A Review and Investigation of Moral Recognition, Evaluation, and Intention.Douglas R. May & Kevin P. Pauli - 2002 - Business and Society 41 (1):84-117.
The Role of Moral Intensity in Moral Judgments: An Empirical Investigation. [REVIEW]Sara A. Morris & Robert A. McDonald - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (9):715 - 726.
Observer Judgements About Moral Agents' Ethical Decisions: The Role of Scope of Justice and Moral Intensity.M. S. Singer & A. E. Singer - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (5):473 - 484.
Citations of this work BETA
Prediction of Whistleblowing or Non-Reporting Observation: The Role of Personal and Situational Factors. [REVIEW]P. G. Cassematis & R. Wortley - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 117 (3):615-634.
The Impact of Financial Incentives and Perceptions of Seriousness on Whistleblowing Intention.Paul Andon, Clinton Free, Radzi Jidin, Gary S. Monroe & Michael J. Turner - forthcoming - Journal of Business Ethics.
Similar books and articles
The Influence of Unethical Peer Behavior on Observers' Unethical Behavior: A Social Cognitive Perspective. [REVIEW]Michael J. O'Fallon & Kenneth D. Butterfield - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 109 (2):117-131.
Moral Differentiation: Exploring Boundaries of the “Monkey See, Monkey Do” Perspective. [REVIEW]Michael J. O'Fallon & Kenneth D. Butterfield - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 102 (3):379-399.
Differences in the Perceptions of Moral Intensity in the Moral Decision Process: An Empirical Examination of Accounting Students. [REVIEW]Deborah L. Leitsch - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (3):313-323.
When Expertise and Ethics Diverge: Lay and Professional Evaluation of Psychotherapists in Israel.Simon Shimshon Rubin & Danah Amir - 2000 - Ethics and Behavior 10 (4):375 – 391.
The Fallout: What Happens to Whistleblowers and Those Accused but Exonerated of Scientific Misconduct?James S. Lubalin & Jennifer L. Matheson - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):229-250.
Internal Vs. External Whistleblowers: A Comparison of Whistleblowering Processes. [REVIEW]TerryMorehead Dworkin & Melissa S. Baucus - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (12):1281-1298.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #112,892 of 2,154,061 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,005 of 2,154,061 )
How can I increase my downloads?